Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.franciliens.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.009 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'responding': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'assumed': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'rounds': 0.09; 'subject:How': 0.10; 'bug': 0.12; 'wrote': 0.14; 'language.': 0.14; 'convey': 0.16; 'elsewhere,': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'invokes': 0.16; 'mainstream': 0.16; 'merely': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:simple': 0.16; 'thereby': 0.16; 'do,': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'not,': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; '>>>': 0.22; 'community.': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'load': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "aren't": 0.24; 'interpret': 0.24; 'logical': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'specifically': 0.29; 'topic': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'strongly': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'everywhere': 0.31; 'implied': 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'open': 0.33; 'comment': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'definition': 0.35; 'sexual': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'clear': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'ben': 0.38; 'challenging': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; '12,': 0.39; 'bad': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'no.': 0.61; 'course': 0.61; 'address': 0.63; 'kind': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'skip:\xe2 10': 0.65; 'talking': 0.65; 'wear': 0.68; 'targeted': 0.69; 'therefore': 0.72; 'anyone.': 0.74; '\xe2\x80\x93': 0.77; '8bit%:46': 0.78; 'female': 0.84; 'femininity': 0.84; 'feminist': 0.84; 'intends': 0.84; 'panties': 0.84; 'sensitivity': 0.84; 'subject:girl': 0.84; 'gender': 0.91; 'subject:!! ': 0.91; 'tough': 0.93; 'woman': 0.96 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: HELP!! How to ask a girl out with a simple witty Python code?? Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 03:59:38 +0000 References: <8c09473e-92df-40ac-b083-d2b3a2b75188@googlegroups.com> <2906370c-58c7-4d8b-8db3-2ea3773b9578@googlegroups.com> <54f8d56a$0$12984$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <54f916b2$0$12980$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <85385izu51.fsf@benfinney.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-92-24-211-56.ppp.as43234.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: <85385izu51.fsf@benfinney.id.au> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.19 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 54 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1425614391 news.xs4all.nl 2912 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36524 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86983 On 06/03/2015 03:23, Ben Finney wrote: > Steven D'Aprano writes: > >> Ben Finney wrote: >> >>> “get their panties all up in a bunch” is a gendered slur. >> >> Why do you interpret that as insulting to women merely on the basis of >> being *female*? > > I think your question is in bad faith. You know as well as I do, and I'm > confident the person who wrote the slur knows, that “panties” strongly > connotes *female* underwear. > >> It seems to me that far from challenging sexual stereotypes, >> mainstream feminist thought actually *reinforces* it: as evidence, you >> assumed that only women wear panties, therefore any reference to >> panty-wearing is therefore a slur on women. > > No. I'm saying that it's clear the person saying “get their panties all > up in a bunch” fully intends to convey specifically *female* underwear, > and thereby to use implied femininity as an insult. > > Yes, of course I know some people who aren't female wear panties. Yes, > of course I know some women wear underwear that isn't panties. Don't try > to change the topic with absurd logical extremes that I didn't raise. > > I'm talking about the implication of the comment as a gendered insult. > >> It's only gender specific if you accept the sexist gendered stereotype >> that all women are by definition thin-skinned and excessively >> sensitive. > > Bullshit. I said nothing about the sensitivity of anyone. Individual > women you may know – even *all* women, everywhere – could be as tough as > nails, and it doesn't address the point I'm raising. > > Whether any particular woman is targeted or not, the comment I'm > responding to invokes female gender as an implied insult. That's > unwelcoming to women, and I don't want such unwelcoming attitudes in > this community. > I'd rather be reading about the 4,773 open issues on the bug tracker. As I consider this rather more important than some completely tangential load of cobblers, would you and MR D'Aprano be kind enough to go and have your 12, 3 minute rounds elsewhere, thanks? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence