Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.013 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; '(so': 0.07; 'subject:Question': 0.07; 'editor.': 0.09; 'subject:Source': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'changes': 0.15; 'books': 0.15; '24,': 0.16; 'bigger.': 0.16; 'cheap.': 0.16; 'docstring': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'mean,': 0.16; 'typo': 0.16; 'fix': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'commit': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'month,': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'correct': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'religious': 0.31; 'summary': 0.32; 'entirely': 0.33; 'not.': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'e.g.': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'even': 0.60; 'read': 0.60; 'easy': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'become': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'mar': 0.68; 'combining': 0.68; 'felt': 0.74; 'subject:Control': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S5wYzH6T82iSaKSDmB/OLo2LHeVkQ074KI4MbX70DBY=; b=lDV6oeXQ2IHbVpOoTq6Rv7+Fs1OrzA/eZy1nnjZsZD7U1mlWWhPz4+WmpzWRCQC+EZ m51lgDuVdqNjZmDPFv4JeSTgqXbjIqocKdq6SLRhU+qkmxWsxle47iaeBIhnwBrB2GtH aBqG7WCNR7CNvh4bkMjYLqjYy1L052Hepwukx9yqj3RXPJ7xMLuluIXb64s5o2HlYYAz z/l/mF15Vd9l2gCH2cPpAop2lruRfw/lJJXDDygPv4Ir/y3vfod1UOw52vd8Sw5vD1tY 4O2JXjENUxG+raOtsbIg1ocMoYrA1mILiqrwlhS4GBTVLWvkVjCI9QTxJGd9wAjcpjiN /oFw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.190.163 with SMTP id gr3mr68343624pbc.103.1395615362406; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:56:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1395586700.55921.YahooMailNeo@web163806.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <532dc915$0$24914$e4fe514c@dreader36.news.xs4all.nl> <20140322134917.080bada6@bigbox.christie.dr> <1395518482.78665.YahooMailNeo@web163804.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1395586700.55921.YahooMailNeo@web163806.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:56:02 +1100 Subject: Re: Question about Source Control From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1395615365 news.xs4all.nl 2858 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55608 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:68824 On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote: > One more thing (so this is not entirely a double post!). While reading th= ese books I found that the authors were pretty religious about Clean Commit= s. I mean, ok, it's not a good idea to do one huge monolithic commit each m= onth, but I felt they were exaggerating. But maybe I'm wrong and clean comm= its become more important when the number of collaborators get bigger. It's= just so easy to fix something, and e.g. correct that typo in a docstring w= hile you're at it. > It's important even with a single editor. When you go back and look at a commit, you should be able to read the summary and know immediately whether a particular line in it should have been edited or not. Combining changes into a single commit makes that harder. Commits are cheap. Do more of 'em rather than less. ChrisA