Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'essentially': 0.04; 'dan': 0.09; 'enormous': 0.09; 'fixed,': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'trees': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'itself.': 0.14; 'finish.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'values': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; '-0700,': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'run': 0.32; "i'd": 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'operations': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'bad': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'days': 0.60; 'read': 0.60; 'solve': 0.60; 'received:173': 0.61; 'mar': 0.68; 'wanting': 0.93 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:15:49 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Balanced trees References: <87eh2d3x8h.fsf_-_@elektro.pacujo.net> <87mwgoqy4k.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <8738ifqlaw.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87wqfrp3jk.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <5328efc8$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: <5328efc8$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3304.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 173.12.184.233 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([173.12.184.233]) [173.12.184.233]:46528 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3IzMzA0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1395243639 news.xs4all.nl 2874 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43292 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:68558 On 03/18/2014 06:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:21:28 -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Marko Rauhamaa >> wrote: >>> Dan Stromberg : >>> For a proper comparison, I'd like a fixed, identical dataset and set of >>> operations run against each data structure. >>> >>> How about this test program: >> >> I used to do essentially this, but it was time-prohibitive and produced >> harder-to-read graphs - harder to read because the enormous values of >> the bad trees were dwarfing the values of the good trees. > > A log graph may be the solution to that: graph the log of the time rather > than time itself. I don't think that will solve the problem of not wanting to wait three days for the test to finish. ;) -- ~Ethan~