Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.176 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.65; '*S*': 0.00; 'gregory': 0.16; 'received :adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '2015': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'written': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'fine': 0.28; 'initial': 0.28; 'pep': 0.29; 'received:be': 0.30; "i'd": 0.31; 'anyone': 0.32; 'maybe': 0.33; 'point': 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'needed': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; "didn't": 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'personally': 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'jul': 0.72; 'construct': 0.84; 'guido.': 0.84; 'received:195.238': 0.84 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=on0vsgdz1NEtXcMZlQwg/MwbIQQ3jhei9UjQb9HCs8o= c=1 sm=2 a=oELIGTqkNWvFJsgneH4A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2D5AADgga5V/zHY9VENT4RQvBAJh3YCgXQUAQEBAQEBAYUtAQEBAwF4EQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRADBgICiCINtGKSP4RmAQEBBwIgi0yFDRaEFQEEhxGGTYZ1jCqBQ4MpkEGDYYQkbYJLAQEB Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 19:33:09 +0200 From: Antoon Pardon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1437499992 news.xs4all.nl 2938 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41226 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:94303 On 07/19/2015 02:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Gregory Ewing > wrote: >> Personally I'd be fine with your initial syntax, but >> something else might be needed to get it past Guido. >> He didn't like my 'cocall f()' construct in PEP 3152, >> which is syntactically isomorphic to 'transfer f()'. > > Maybe it should get written up and rejected, then, to be something to > point to any time anyone advocates TCO. Those who remember the history of pep 308 will not find that a strong deterrent.