Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.017 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'rewrite': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'antoine': 0.16; 'boards': 0.16; 'mmap': 0.16; 'numpy': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:which': 0.16; 'twisted': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'library': 0.18; 'all,': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'code,': 0.22; 'select': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'either.': 0.24; 'frameworks': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'testing': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'directly,': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'figure': 0.32; 'device': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'days': 0.60; 'map': 0.64; 'pick': 0.64; 'drivers': 0.74; 'actually,': 0.84; 'pci': 0.84; 'received:139': 0.84; 'yourself?': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91; 'regions': 0.93; 'directly.': 0.95 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Neal Becker Subject: Re: which async framework? Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 07:16:23 -0400 References: <531E22DF.7030709@simplistix.co.uk> <1733040935416225908.878896sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: exa2-in-fw-01-epn.hns.com User-Agent: KNode/4.12.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 33 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1394622996 news.xs4all.nl 2884 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44656 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:68272 Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2014-03-11, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> Sturla Molden gmail.com> writes: >>> >>> Chris Withers simplistix.co.uk> wrote: >>> > Hi All, >>> > >>> > I see python now has a plethora of async frameworks and I need to try >>> > and pick one to use from: >>> > >>> > - asyncio/tulip >>> > - tornado >>> > - twisted >>> >>> I'd go for using iocp, epoll and kqueue/kevent directly. Why bother to >>> learn a framework? You will find epoll and kqueue/kevent in the select >>> module and iocp in pywin32. >> >> Yes, why use a library when you can rewrite it all yourself? >> Actually, you should probably issue system calls to the kernel directly, >> the libc is overrated (as is portability, I suppose). > > And don't bother with device drivers for the network adapters either. > Just map their PCI regions in to user-space and twiddle the reigisters > directly! ;) > > [I do that when testing PCI boards with C code, and one of these days > I'm going to figure out how to do it with Python.] > Use numpy with mmap