Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.016 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'received:openend.se': 0.09; 'received:theraft.openend.se': 0.09; 'subject:2.7': 0.09; '>that': 0.16; 'ah,': 0.16; 'cc:addr:lac': 0.16; 'cc:addr:openend.se': 0.16; 'from:addr:lac': 0.16; 'from:addr:openend.se': 0.16; 'from:name:laura creighton': 0.16; 'means.': 0.16; 'message-id:@fido.openend.se': 0.16; 'received:89.233': 0.16; 'received:89.233.217': 0.16; 'received:89.233.217.133': 0.16; 'received:fido': 0.16; 'received:fido.openend.se': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'laura': 0.18; '2015': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'prevent': 0.20; 'cc:2**1': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'see:': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'equivalent': 0.27; 'least': 0.27; '-0700,': 0.29; 'about.': 0.29; 'received:se': 0.29; 'subject: [': 0.29; 'url:wikipedia': 0.29; 'cc:no real name:2**1': 0.29; 'url:wiki': 0.30; 'that,': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'mean': 0.38; 'speak': 0.38; 'url:en': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'well.': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.61; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'you.': 0.64; 'between': 0.65; 'jul': 0.72; 'inform': 0.79; 'chinese': 0.79; 'received:89': 0.80; 'hand': 0.82; 'boys': 0.84; 'dialect': 0.84; 'dialects.': 0.84; 'roman': 0.84; 'absolutely': 0.88 To: Rustom Mody cc: python-list@python.org, lac@openend.se From: Laura Creighton Subject: Re: Devanagari int literals [was Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?] In-Reply-To: Message from Rustom Mody of "Mon, 20 Jul 2015 20:30:48 -0700." <76252f32-64e9-405b-84a2-996200a6fa6f@googlegroups.com> References: <7083e494-6192-4acb-aea9-216d858171bc@googlegroups.com> <55ab2b57$0$1664$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com><76252f32-64e9-405b-84a2-996200a6fa6f@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <15646.1437466226.1@fido> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:10:26 +0200 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (theraft.openend.se [89.233.217.130]); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:10:31 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1437466239 news.xs4all.nl 2888 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36079 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:94274 In a message of Mon, 20 Jul 2015 20:30:48 -0700, Rustom Mody writes: >BTW my boys have just mailed me their latest: > >>>> 九.九九 > >9.99 > >Can some unicode/Chinese literate person inform me whether >that ideograph is equivalent to roman '9' or roman 'nine'? Ah, I don't understand you. What do you mean roman 'nine'? a phonetic way of saying things? What bankers use to help prevent forgeries? Something else? 九 is a numberal. The numberal 9. For absolutely certain. But since I don't know what you mean by 'nine' it may mean that, as well. 九 is not restricted to any particular dialect of Chinese -- if you speak any chinese you will know what this means. On the other hand the pinyan (phonetic) way to pronounce numbers can vary between dialects. Chinese has *many* ways of writing numbers, at least 4 I know about. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_numerals Laura