Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.057 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'programmer': 0.03; 'static': 0.04; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'aggregates': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:python': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'typing': 0.19; 'python?': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'java': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'wondering': 0.29; 'figure': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'totally': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'except': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'c++': 0.36; 'scheduled': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'changing': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'explain': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'url:2012': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'users': 0.40; 'removing': 0.60; 'lost': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'offer': 0.62; 'today': 0.64; 'great': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'subject:. ': 0.67; 'benefit': 0.68; 'url:me': 0.69; 'user,': 0.69; 'respect': 0.70; 'removal': 0.74; 'article': 0.77; 'awesome,': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'subject:removal': 0.84; 'them)': 0.84; 'url:comments': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Neil Cerutti Subject: Re: golang OO removal, benefits. over python? Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwich University References: <95cb6bd9-5030-4389-9891-578bb87af219@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: jackman.norwich.edu User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1/mm/ao (Win32) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 34 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1394548697 news.xs4all.nl 2970 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53110 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:68217 On 2014-03-10, flebber wrote: > I was wondering if a better programmer than I could explain if > the removal of OO features in golang really does offer an great > benefit over python. > > An article I was reading ran through a brief overview of golang > in respect of OO features > http://areyoufuckingcoding.me/2012/07/25/object-desoriented-language/ > . > > maybe removing OO features would be a benefit to c++ users or > Java users but python? > > As I have seen an interesting reddit or two of people trying to > figure out go today it was a ruby user, totally lost with > structs. > > So anecdotally is actually python and ruby users changing to > Go, here is a blog and reddit from Rob Pike. > http://www.reddit.com/comments/1mue70 > > Why would a Python user change to go except for new and > interesting? Static typing combined with duck typing and simple distribution of applications is a draw. Go's tools are pretty awesome, and are scheduled for improvements. If you can get by with its built in types (or simple aggregates of them) it feels quite expressive. -- Neil Cerutti