Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'url:pypi': 0.03; 'coverage.': 0.07; 'result,': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'suppose': 0.07; 'test,': 0.07; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'part,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:using': 0.09; 'unittest': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'function?': 0.16; 'inconvenient': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'supplying': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'result.': 0.19; 'input': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'options': 0.25; 'this:': 0.26; 'values': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'testing': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'assert': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'factor': 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'stuff': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'e.g.': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'skip:* 10': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'myself': 0.63; 'provide': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'hints': 0.68; 'increase': 0.74; 'mock': 0.84; 'subject:Testing': 0.84; 'lot,': 0.93; 'technique': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: Testing interactive code using raw_input Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:57:19 +0100 Organization: None References: <531de147$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bdb6ee.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.11.5 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 49 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1394470660 news.xs4all.nl 2932 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37416 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:68162 Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Does anyone have any good hints for testing interactive code that uses > raw_input, or input in Python 3? > > A simple technique would be to factor out the interactive part, e.g. like > this: > > # Before > def spam(): > answer = raw_input(prompt) > return eggs(answer) + cheese(answer) + toast(answer) > > # After > def spam(): > answer = raw_input(prompt) > return func(answer) > > def func(s): > return eggs(s) + cheese(s) + toast(s) > > > > and then test func. But how about times where it is inconvenient to > factor out the raw_input stuff out of the function? E.g. suppose you have > a function that takes some arguments, gathers some more values > interactively, processes the lot, and then returns a result. With an > automated test, I can provide the arguments, and check the result, but > what are my options for *automatically* supplying input to raw_input? https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mock In Python 3 this is part of the standard library: from unittest import mock def sum_it(): return "{} + {} = {}".format(input(), input(), input()) with mock.patch('builtins.input', side_effect="123"): assert sum_it() == "1 + 2 = 3" I have not yet used it myself so far; instead I did something like def sum_it(input=input): ... and then passed a hand-crafted mock input function to increase coverage.