Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone02.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone02.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.015 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'interpreted': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'interpreter,': 0.16; 'itself,': 0.16; 'language)': 0.16; 'message-id:@4ax.com': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; '(in': 0.22; 'url:home': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'run': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'basic': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'performance': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'first': 0.61; 'taking': 0.65; 'mar': 0.68; 'home': 0.69; 'felt': 0.74; '2015': 0.84; 'subject:Practices': 0.84; 'received:108': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Dennis Lee Bieber Subject: Re: Python Worst Practices Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 20:37:30 -0500 Organization: IISS Elusive Unicorn References: <7053A277-9687-49B0-9FDB-CB4DB3E76DEC@gmail.com> <54F0E38D.40006@davea.name> <54f274bb$0$13011$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-108-79-222-205.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 X-No-Archive: YES X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.19 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1425260269 news.xs4all.nl 2907 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60583 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl X-Received-Bytes: 3637 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1403747200 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86691 On Sun, 1 Mar 2015 13:43:50 +1100, Chris Angelico declaimed the following: >losing performance. Conversely, I'm sure Python could also have been >implemented on top of BASIC if someone felt like it, though what the >advantages might be I have no idea. But performance is not (or should You'd be able to run it on a TI99/4 (in which the BASIC interpreter, itself, was run on an interpreter... nothing like taking the first "16-bit" home computer and shackling it with an interpreted language that was run on an interpreted language) -- Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/