Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'asm': 0.16; 'bieber': 0.16; 'declaimed': 0.16; 'email addr:ix.netcom.com': 0.16; 'email name:wlfraed': 0.16; 'file).': 0.16; 'from:addr:ix.netcom.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:wlfraed': 0.16; 'from:name:dennis lee bieber': 0.16; 'okay,': 0.16; 'received:wlfraed': 0.16; 'sigma': 0.16; 'subject:Programming': 0.16; 'url:netcom': 0.16; 'url:wlfraed': 0.16; 'wulfraed': 0.16; 'mon,': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'rewrite': 0.18; 'url:home': 0.21; '+0100,': 0.23; 'macros': 0.23; 'loaded': 0.25; "wasn't": 0.25; 'code': 0.26; 'definition': 0.30; 'equivalent': 0.31; 'idea': 0.32; 'languages': 0.32; 'file': 0.34; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'lee': 0.34; 'structured': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'machine': 0.37; 'charset :us-ascii': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'received:76': 0.37; 'subject:with': 0.37; 'could': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'met': 0.62; 'subject:. ': 0.63; 'course.': 0.66; 'roughly': 0.67; 'dennis': 0.73; 'maximize': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Dennis Lee Bieber Subject: Re: Programming D. E. Knuth in Python with the Deterministic Finite Automaton construct Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:02:50 -0400 Organization: > Bestiaria Support Staff < References: <4f64a3a0$0$1386$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <4f64a9e5$0$1385$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <4f64d00a$0$1390$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <4f6685a2$0$1389$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-76-253-99-231.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 X-No-Archive: YES X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1332133377 news.xs4all.nl 6915 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60309 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:21876 On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:02:23 +0100, Kiuhnm declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: > > Many ASM languages don't have structured control flow statements but > only jmps, which are roughly equivalent to gotos. A good decompiler will > need to analize the net of jmps and try to rewrite the code using > structured control flow statements. > The idea is to maximize readability, of course. > Never met Sigma's Meta-Symbol Okay, the machine level code was limited to basic condition/jump... But a master of Meta-Symbol (I wasn't such -- not in a trimester college course) could create macros that would make it structured. In a way, Meta-Symbol wasn't an assembly language so much as a language for defining assembly languages (I once wasted a few hours at work writing out the Meta-Symbol definition file needed to produce absolute-address 8080 output. Even the native Sigma instruction set had to be loaded into Meta-Symbol before it could process a file). -- Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/