Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'string.': 0.04; 'python': 0.08; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; '3.2,': 0.16; 'strs': 0.16; 'subject:formatting': 0.16; 'subject:vs.': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'seems': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'fine': 0.26; 'guess': 0.28; 'sat,': 0.28; 'all,': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'unicode': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'chris': 0.32; 'optimization': 0.36; 'page': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85.161': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.40; 'subject:. ': 0.66; '12:16': 0.84; '2.7.': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=oJNGFaVGfdvCQYDOKnHhcoFC3WnQazwoQ4Thkc09z2A=; b=INiEsb35r5ebn7q1t5Zs/h23uBpnKjZS6CG3T2UjbxMSb28sxpwYGoiqmQ+JgU9GVD 4k0tYiaF9uWBAirMiQGraQELGn36TxFcYmsZTTsxroCX/zLE/N3uCuq5fZI6Yj302jQw uTyatyP5XyX+Uwu8n9XWES5vTSE3fo1kzWTlA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4e17e790$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> From: Ian Kelly Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 00:29:38 -0600 Subject: Re: String concatenation vs. string formatting To: Chris Angelico Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1310193009 news.xs4all.nl 21891 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40013 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9111 On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > Has the same optimization been implemented for Unicode? The page > doesn't mention Python 3 at all, and I would guess that the realloc > optimization would work fine for both types of string. Seems to be implemented for strs in 3.2, but not unicode in 2.7.