Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.073
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.85; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:spam': 0.07; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'ignore': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'normally': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'issue.': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; "aren't": 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'posts': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'comment': 0.34; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'reflect': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'list.': 0.37; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'relatively': 0.65; 'reply': 0.66; 'believe': 0.68; 'mar': 0.68; 'prevailing': 0.84; 'spammer': 0.84; 'amongst': 0.91; 'attitude': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=rT4VOdRRd9INvUHBQC47WC0Q+bJ36D78BEYQssOKxeU=; b=CZpyEK5vyVHfrfBdymaDZ1jL2jjMvFWRV5TJuaNXplq9ZgAon3JCIkaC3kKsEFLT80 QHzbBefFA+SSu/Twfw9fCRlQgffcfOfVCAIwQf2LOg/q79XVVanGCn5Nlg/KgHpM1rJF ZNILL/+hcL+fU5MMnJa956j5ywDRF1FAcY96M4l8IcFj1Ovv3/oGDsEXxWmaLVUT4ukE 3QIfZyYAFnvZjKsKcdK4MM9jF6kQ/mc6PKQO8iSq6Hr2/kSOO0yAj390S0SPwiquzxlN fO77XvVO/JOhxyyEXAGKDPI5gdhI1J5eZCK8PgDvmahgEXjY/ClMZr32umHCFYRqQWEi SXMw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.77 with SMTP id z13mr160414wjw.64.1394284745349; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 05:19:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <lff51n$aoc$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <d72d9e78-ee11-4833-b3b2-e90ab52a6d4c@googlegroups.com> <c80f6c49-ac85-4ba4-8ca9-b305a1f4f84e@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmqf_q=-7e3hgKWO50MBhvronkV1p6_-Qf6Gbei_G6=w2g@mail.gmail.com> <lff51n$aoc$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 00:19:05 +1100
Subject: Re: spam (wasRe: extract from json)
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.7927.1394284752.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 25
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1394284752 news.xs4all.nl 2873 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41561
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:68033

On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 08/03/2014 03:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:21 PM,  <thrinaxodon666@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it's better if you (CENSORED) off.
>>
>>
>> Teddybubu, please understand that the above comment is from a spammer
>> and does not reflect the prevailing attitude of this list. I don't
>> like to make content-free posts like this, but as you already have the
>> answer you need, there's not a lot for me to add :)
>>
>> ChrisA
>>
>
> This particular PITA of a spammer is one of the very few that I see on
> Thunderbird via gmane.  I believe that Terry Reedy amongst others does a
> good job of keeping us relatively spam free.  Thanks all.

Normally I ignore him (and yes, I see those posts too, in Gmail).
Stand-alone posts aren't an issue. I just didn't want a new poster to
see that reply go through unchallenged.

ChrisA