Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'reason,': 0.07; 'revision': 0.07; '"if': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'compiler.': 0.16; 'message-id:@4ax.com': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'rewriting': 0.16; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'fix': 0.17; 'code,': 0.22; 'url:home': 0.24; 'why.': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'downloaded': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'needed.': 0.30; 'url:wiki': 0.31; 'once,': 0.31; 'url:wikipedia': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; "can't": 0.35; 'google': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'application': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'ago.': 0.61; 'john': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'week,': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'mar': 0.68; 'lives': 0.74; 'it"': 0.84; 'thing,': 0.91; 'received:108': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Dennis Lee Bieber Subject: Re: Python programming Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:38:54 -0500 Organization: IISS Elusive Unicorn References: <201402112314.42370.gheskett@wdtv.com> <82055DB9-758F-4B4C-9993-FE4DA60E3D50@mac.com> <560e7dcc-6557-44b8-89f7-adaafa9f0e29@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-108-79-216-190.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 X-No-Archive: YES X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1394239141 news.xs4all.nl 2911 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57148 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:68012 On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:03:35 -0800 (PST), John Ladasky declaimed the following: > >As for FORTRAN? This week, I actually downloaded an application which required a FORTRAN compiler. This is the only FORTRAN application I've ever needed. It's not old code, the first revision came out about 10 years ago. More than once, I have queried Google with the phrase "Why isn't FORTRAN dead yet?" For some reason, it lives on. I can't say that I understand why. Well, for one thing, no one can justify rewriting all the numerics libraries... LAPACK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAPACK , NEC-2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_Electromagnetics_Code (and likely NEC-4). "If it works, don't fix it" -- Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/