Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone03.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone03.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'badly': 0.07; 'so?': 0.07; 'patch.': 0.09; 'patches': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:2.7': 0.09; '2.7': 0.13; 'fixes.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; ';-)': 0.18; '2015': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'bit': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.26; "they'll": 0.29; 'thus,': 0.29; 'themselves': 0.29; 'somebody': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'implement': 0.32; 'know.': 0.34; 'so,': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'someone': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'capable': 0.65; 'difficulty': 0.66; 'here': 0.66; 'received:217': 0.66; 'jul': 0.72; 'sunday': 0.72; 'cecil': 0.84; 'westerhof': 0.84; 'comment.': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: dieter Subject: Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:36:49 +0200 References: <87y4icxh4r.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <87mvysxe6y.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e09b25.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vh7b19Q4TXnAQ+lnof9JqpP/VX8= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1437374218 news.xs4all.nl 2873 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46934 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl X-Received-Bytes: 3917 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3141527818 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:94214 Mark Lawrence writes: > On 19/07/2015 18:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 18:38 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote: > ... >> You think so? I think that a lot of people who are using 2.7 would >> like to have the fixes. They know how to use Python, but they would >> not now how to implement a patch. That is why I made this comment. >> > > I don't think so, I know. If they want the patches that badly and > can't do it themselves they'll have to grin and bear it, or do a bit > of begging, or pay somebody to do it for them. Well, there might be "budget constraints" and the difficulty to find someone capable of doing a backport. We are doing here some form of "begging". Thus, we are in line with your recommendations ;-)