Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: UNSURE 0.223 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.70; '*S*': 0.14; 'arguments': 0.05; 'one?': 0.05; 'gui': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; ':-d': 0.16; 'rantingrick': 0.16; 'pm,': 0.16; 'say,': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'code': 0.24; 'creating': 0.24; 'windows': 0.26; 'separate': 0.31; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'but': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'user': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:192.168.1': 0.39; 'correctly': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'subject:!': 0.67; 'present.': 0.67; '12:29': 0.84; 'received:209.85.218.46': 0.91; 'received:mail- yi0-f46.google.com': 0.91; 'complexity': 0.93; 'increases': 0.93; 'technique': 0.93; 'reducing': 0.95 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hVa+wqwecqwQz6UHFUqlMqNOX1IQl7jaVrO0bXS/vu8=; b=BBzGtwJp9HgL4IlmnSRX9k9aqv/dz2BJQ7YpjkPrcQGphiC5kT4icZ1raoNRnql6BW XcykSASYxI4rxJa9B442VP9xcb5Ld7XAm0PBb8tm6biFq3n0QQxS4e0PpTghSkxcwlFW hKDpjFNPExkESShznG2HcxLFD3FvyQMyqdgas= Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:42:04 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "comp.lang.python" Subject: Re: Implicit initialization is EVIL! References: <97dc7iF9eiU1@mid.individual.net> <78624344-9696-42c9-9ed8-9454c55c1d9f@g12g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <97ga0jFq2lU1@mid.individual.net> <4e131ef7$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4e133509$0$12858$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <999dd05c-cae5-4c86-8ee7-6e1d6116d2ed@gh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <97icm3Ft0eU1@mid.individual.net> <97kur2FlkhU1@mid.individual.net> <371088c4-b0c1-4cdb-bd50-357c695b9c47@j25g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <371088c4-b0c1-4cdb-bd50-357c695b9c47@j25g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:51:06 +0200 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1310122267 news.xs4all.nl 21790 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50977 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9073 On 2011.07.07 12:29 PM, rantingrick wrote: > So you prefer to close a gazillion windows one by one? If so, why not > just code the GUI correctly from the start; by creating separate > transactions? Thereby reducing the number of windows a user must > juggle? FYI: You know the user complexity of a GUI increases > exponentially by the number of windows present. :-D Are you paid to troll? I must say, your technique of presenting semi-logical, but completely wrong arguments is admirable. Truly the work of a professional.