Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'fixes': 0.05; 'allowed.': 0.07; 'patch.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:2.7': 0.09; 'bug': 0.10; 'fixes.': 0.16; 'made,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'who?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'fix': 0.21; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'everyone': 0.31; 'surely': 0.33; 'so,': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'charset :us-ascii': 0.37; 'wanted': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'capable': 0.65; 'believe': 0.66; '>>>>>': 0.66; "they're": 0.66; 'received:217': 0.66; 'jul': 0.72; 'sunday': 0.72; 'cecil': 0.84; 'westerhof': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: dieter Subject: Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:10:57 +0200 References: <87y4icxh4r.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e09b25.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BshY/7sDy3lWKw7m2M2Z0M99Ab8= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1437372905 news.xs4all.nl 2948 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57550 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl X-Received-Bytes: 3800 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2993795405 Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!bcyclone01.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone01.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:94211 Ian Kelly writes: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote: >> >>> On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote: >>>> On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote: >>>>> to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed? >>>> >>>> Of course, allowed. But should they be made, and if so, by who? >>> >>> The people who want the fixes. >> >> Babies want clean diapers. So babies have to change diapers >> themselves? > > Poor analogy. Babies need others to change their diapers for them > because they're not capable of doing it for themselves. I believe Cecil was aware of this and wanted to stress: not everyone who needs a fix is also able to backport a corresponding patch.