Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '(of': 0.05; 'cpython': 0.05; 'python': 0.08; 'dict': 0.09; 'globals': 0.09; 'none)': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'argument': 0.15; 'lambda': 0.16; 'object)': 0.16; 'proceed?': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'to:addr:pearwood.info': 0.16; 'to:addr:steve+comp.lang.python': 0.16; "to:name:steven d'aprano": 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'ticket.': 0.18; '(most': 0.21; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.21; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.21; 'tracker': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'though.': 0.23; 'traceback': 0.24; 'sat,': 0.25; 'cc:2**0': 0.26; 'up.': 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'looks': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'typeerror:': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; 'quite': 0.31; 'cases': 0.32; 'done,': 0.32; "i've": 0.32; 'does': 0.32; 'implement': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; "can't": 0.33; 'instead': 0.33; 'updated': 0.33; 'checking': 0.34; 'steven': 0.34; 'someone': 0.34; '17,': 0.34; 'last):': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'uses': 0.38; 'purposes': 0.38; 'could': 0.38; 'couple': 0.38; 'unless': 0.39; 'suggestions': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'change': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'type': 0.61; 'more': 0.61; 'bothered': 0.68; 'care': 0.71; 'spot': 0.79; 'dict,': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZoE3+7KsBzQgs5pJGXiKIl39OyUw0gYKA/6NLDzfAcc=; b=oAd0rbfIUgLHuNVM8pUzmhU02MLZtFULeyS/RqomjT0oQurI9eIpKgI2dR95ba/LRi t5dWt0xnz4Jnz0BYUaMwbguN1wZTGZwhTSnsEXWkeGb7xG2XBr86ciO6GYi9h4oFn8Hj NcJBUFiIsucBHHMfFtfxPwXVbgWN16PNa/Cqw+xr/hf+sq3zzSJxjgD1o4P4g0rj2oT0 hCo4bVGoXuZtFQE4sCNojG1B/iWj/aZ5l01GPL+FPeS+1OnxZYB7VnWCi5hK9XclDklT 4VMu8ANF3QZ5jAt39FaDqo/UvQAvxCG76otkg5PziEj/X1Ac+X4/gER27GnWFqSB3tJD B9Hw== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4f647317$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> References: <4f647317$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 11:42:49 -0700 Subject: Re: Using non-dict namespaces in functions From: Eric Snow To: "Steven D'Aprano" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 37 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1332009772 news.xs4all.nl 6926 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53950 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:21828 On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Note that it is important for my purposes that MockChainMap does not > inherit from dict. Care to elaborate? > Now I try to create a function that uses a MockChainMap instead of a dict > for its globals: > > function =3D type(lambda: None) > f =3D lambda x: (a+b+x) > g =3D function(f.__code__, MockChainMap(), 'g') > > And that's where I get into trouble: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > =A0File "", line 1, in > TypeError: function() argument 2 must be dict, not MockChainMap > > > How do I build a function with globals set to a non-dict mapping? > > If this can't be done, any suggestions for how I might proceed? This looks like one of those cases where there is strict type checking (of a Python object) at the C level. You may consider bringing this up in a tracker ticket. Unless there are performance implications, it's likely a case of no one having bothered to change this spot to be more duck-type friendly. There are quite a few of those in CPython and I've seen at least a couple updated when someone brought it up. Regardless, you could also implement __call__() on a function look-alike class to get what you're after. It may not be as performant though. -eric