Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:209.85.212.46': 0.03; 'received:mail-vw0-f46.google.com': 0.03; 'subject:" ': 0.03; 'subject:test': 0.05; 'seemed': 0.07; '>>>>': 0.09; 'dict': 0.09; 'referenced': 0.09; 'that).': 0.09; 'def': 0.13; ';-)': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'equality.': 0.16; 'keyerror:': 0.16; 'remembered': 0.16; 'subject:was': 0.16; 'traceback': 0.16; '(most': 0.16; 'performing': 0.22; 'subject:]': 0.22; 'convert': 0.22; '(and': 0.22; 'last):': 0.23; 'wonder': 0.24; 'worked': 0.24; 'received:209.85.212': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'testing': 0.28; 'beyond': 0.28; 'minimal': 0.29; 'comparison': 0.31; 'subject: [': 0.31; 'turns': 0.31; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.32; '...': 0.32; 'url:docs': 0.33; 'actually': 0.34; 'expensive': 0.35; '"",': 0.35; 'test.': 0.35; 'think': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'url:python': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; 'set': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'sets': 0.40; 'would': 0.40; "it's": 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; '2011': 0.62; 'making': 0.62; 'confirm': 0.71; 'link?': 0.84 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: z@etiol.net X-Originating-IP: [200.107.244.177] Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:34:31 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AvJXVhqIKtaQmVOKmBKISeZ3ddw Subject: dict comparison [was: suggestions, comments on an "is_subdict" test] From: Zero Piraeus To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 32 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1303497274 news.xs4all.nl 81479 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:51408 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3884 : On 22 April 2011 13:30, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: >>>> def is_subdict(test_dct, base_dct): > ... =C2=A0 =C2=A0 return test_dct <=3D base_dct and all(test_dct[k] =3D= =3D base_dct[k] for > ... k in test_dct) > ... >>>> is_subdict({1:0}, {2:0}) > Traceback (most recent call last): > =C2=A0File "", line 1, in > =C2=A0File "", line 3, in is_subdict > =C2=A0File "", line 3, in > KeyError: 1 > > I think you have to convert to sets before performing the <=3D comparison= to > get a proper subset test. Huh. I thought I remembered that dict comparison worked like set comparison (and my admittedly minimal testing seemed to confirm that). Turns out it's actually "consistent, but not otherwise defined" beyond equality. http://docs.python.org/reference/expressions.html#id15 I maintain that the behaviour I expected makes more sense ;-) I wonder whether making it work the way I want it to (dammit) would have been as prohibitively expensive as the lexicographical comparison mentioned in the footnote referenced in the above link? -[]z.