Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.04; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'stack,': 0.09; 'structure,': 0.09; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'language.': 0.14; 'heap,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:variable': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'subject:] ': 0.20; 'memory': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; '---': 0.24; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; 'object.': 0.31; 'struct': 0.31; 'actual': 0.34; "i'll": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'structure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'subject:Can': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'viruses': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'address': 0.63; 'protection': 0.63; 'field': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'antivirus': 0.68; 'containing': 0.69; 'edwards': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: [OT] Can global variable be passed into Python function? Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 16:55:49 +0000 References: <27ac2248-0ca3-4ba6-9d25-eaad324bc5e9@googlegroups.com> <87sird7wuw.fsf@handshake.de> <8454E8CB-E6E3-452F-8E54-9A77BFF34EC2@gmail.com> <1m3gg9lbf2ln5m2kbki954t17mqni3b20k@4ax.com> <53095145$0$29985$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <877g8mcg1m.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87ob1yay9m.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <08aa32de-cd51-4888-bd60-2c2b53d86ecc@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-147-179-76.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140301-2, 01/03/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1393779608 news.xs4all.nl 2880 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38225 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:67457 On 02/03/2014 16:45, Grant Edwards wrote: > > That's irrelevent. The actual location of the memory containing the > struct object (static, stack, heap, shared) doesn't matter. The > address of the first field in a struture object _is_ the address of > the structure object. > You say struture, I'll say structure, let's call the whole thing off :) -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com