Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.053 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.00; ';-)': 0.03; 'board.': 0.05; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'logic': 0.09; 'subject:posting': 0.09; 'itself.': 0.14; 'drag': 0.16; 'expert,': 0.16; 'expert.': 0.16; 'nail': 0.16; 'objection': 0.16; 'scope,': 0.16; 'soap,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'solution.': 0.20; 'machine': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'certainly': 0.24; 'cheers,': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'respects': 0.31; 'strip': 0.31; 'though.': 0.31; 'becomes': 0.33; 'lab': 0.33; 'url :non-standard http port': 0.33; 'problem': 0.35; 'received:66': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'done': 0.36; 'problems': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'itself': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'received:unknown': 0.61; 'equipment': 0.61; 'march': 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'complete': 0.62; 'header:Message- Id:1': 0.63; 'charset:windows-1256': 0.64; 'notice:': 0.67; 'believe': 0.68; 'saturday': 0.68; 'received:204': 0.75; '100%': 0.77; '100': 0.79; 'touching': 0.84; 'boxes': 0.91; 'edwards': 0.91; 'probe': 0.91 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: + From: Gene Heskett To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: posting code snippets Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:55:11 -0500 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1256" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 33 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1393711318 news.xs4all.nl 2902 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55091 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:67376 On Saturday 01 March 2014 16:52:44 Grant Edwards did opine: > On 2014-02-28, Chris Angelico wrote: > > The problem does have to believe that the rubber duck/teddy > > bear/figurine is an expert, though. I've had my siblings or parents > > come to me with problems and, without saying a word or touching the > > computer or anything, I've solved them. The problem itself respects > > my skill, and retracts its objection and solves itself. > > The same thing works with expensive/complex test equipment instead of > an expert. > > You drag out the lab scope, logic analyzer, spectrum analyzer, sweep > generator, strip plotter, and the machine that goes "ping". You start > to get everything set up to nail that problem securely to the > dissecting board. Long before you actually get to that point, the > problem becomes intimidated and reveals itself and a solution. Chuckle ;-) Is there not a Murphy's Law corollary on that, Grant? I have certainly been there and done that enough times to know its 100% true. Cheers, Gene -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page NOTICE: Will pay 100 USD for an HP-4815A defective but complete probe assembly.