Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'string': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'type,': 0.09; '\xe2\x80\x94': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '*values*': 0.16; 'comparable.': 0.16; 'energies': 0.16; 'fine.': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'identifiers.': 0.16; 'objects.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reliably': 0.16; 'subject:variable': 0.16; 'trying': 0.19; 'not,': 0.20; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'comparing': 0.24; 'regardless': 0.24; 'compare': 0.26; 'values': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'getting': 0.31; 'commonly': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'languages': 0.32; 'everyone': 0.33; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'received:com.au': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'ben': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'subject:Can': 0.60; 'no.': 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'choose': 0.64; 'telling': 0.64; 'democracy': 0.84; 'received:125': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Ben Finney Subject: Re: Can global variable be passed into Python function? Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 00:03:32 +1100 References: <27ac2248-0ca3-4ba6-9d25-eaad324bc5e9@googlegroups.com> <5f4f5a5f-327a-4616-8235-17ee9e74c488@googlegroups.com> <530fef58$0$11113$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <871tynznpd.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <53104798$0$11113$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <87ha7jy2qs.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87k3ceeq0m.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87zjlad8q4.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <874n3irz04.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87k3ceqhti.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: vmx15867.hosting24.com.au X-Public-Key-ID: 0xBD41714B X-Public-Key-Fingerprint: 9CFE 12B0 791A 4267 887F 520C B7AC 2E51 BD41 714B X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-gpg.asc X-Post-From: Ben Finney User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dnlSulSJRbjdx8jLVJHHRLtmZkg= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 39 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1393679028 news.xs4all.nl 2939 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33858 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:67314 Marko Rauhamaa writes: > Ben Finney : > > > Use ‘==’, since that's all that matters for getting a value that will > > work fine. > > You are telling me to use '==' if I choose string objects and 'is' if I > choose some other objects. No. I'm telling you that ‘is’ is *wrong* for comparing strings, because it is unreliable. > I prefer a solution that works regardless of what objects I choose for > identifiers. Some languages have a “symbol” type, whose values can be directly compared. Python doesn't have such a type. If you want to use strings as a substitute, go ahead: they work fine. But compare strings by *equality*, not identity, because it's their *values* which will be the identifiers. Their object identity will not be reliably comparable. That's what everyone has been telling you all along, for reasons already explained. > There really is no taboo against string object identity if you know what > you are doing. You, as has been amply demonstrated, do not, despite your dogmatic assertions. -- \ “Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to | `\ trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule — and | _o__) both commonly succeed, and are right.” —Henry L. Mencken | Ben Finney