Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'function,': 0.07; 'argument,': 0.09; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'sake': 0.09; '16,': 0.15; 'subject:application': 0.15; 'argument)': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'arguments': 0.18; 'subject:not': 0.19; '(which': 0.19; 'cheers,': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'subject:use': 0.24; 'received:209.85.220': 0.25; 'cc:2**0': 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'raise': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'implicitly': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'it?': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.34; 'normally': 0.34; 'steven': 0.34; 'calling': 0.34; 'apply': 0.35; '(for': 0.35; '8bit%:86': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'skip:\xd0 20': 0.77; 'sender:addr:chris': 0.84; 'subject:skip:j 10': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rebertia.com; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5X6ZUya7m7Rb5UKNM+8ExgpOgVcNh6oins/ZAfw7NQM=; b=ejJ3P0pi1ejz6yJyW59uoxc0g2zDA0J+BTeVgQWWMVppC2uH/6fypzURNVmN5fTVL8 DQmd1A5aOtf7T+0UyGi1WMZbeox/Ai5MI9jNdXhbhM1evIwjs5C0ky38fVsL9Xi1IAq1 3IK5wXHClEGvNoAth540duJJv1D/mtq6n77H8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=5X6ZUya7m7Rb5UKNM+8ExgpOgVcNh6oins/ZAfw7NQM=; b=OAWwbASTnbccPpnckeVPdOLqQL58RGKxHxCBG0gY2QBUUTdKuudnZh/lW6bHPtc/Zv svCbsmzCm2G/rFQmTwGnL3IiV6+ymTjw64D5AsFmNgC7ScKbATSCjd9wp19VgGnVqosZ BDN9m+lyBk57vc6gTRN9rhxH2zOmm5Su3cpf4PIk81CDi+r7FumM+SeIoSv3n55uUID1 ejIv9Le4tZfBPHuMar1S0GyM8h6usOOpGZsIXpUFr43zQrG9yM0vAANnYYC5cbbMyusX JRRyFlqQPvbRxcyth2RkIG0iP3WCFTAXNM3R6faGvbet7tOwjBDQjG9PfLOBqhRPFFt2 3qfw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: chris@rebertia.com In-Reply-To: References: <42cac695-761e-4cdb-aa3b-7c82789b76f9@h20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4f636391$0$1382$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <4f636acb$0$1381$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <4f636e43$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:02:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: W_s0tU0JknyNTHbyfTldnXGIhCI Subject: Re: Why not use juxtaposition to indicate function application From: Chris Rebert To: Serhiy Storchaka Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmWNTN6Cm3opbLf5Il1IzzO6ATqbIndu48Ec3hcPnNagB/vU9ZRfr2ydYoKizT4pBPD3s3e Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1331931775 news.xs4all.nl 6938 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40166 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:21780 On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wro= te: > 16.03.12 18:45, Steven D'Aprano =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0= =B2(=D0=BB=D0=B0): >> If f is a function which normally takes (for the sake of the argument) >> one argument, then f would call the function with no arguments (which ma= y >> return a curried function, or may apply default arguments, or perhaps >> raise an exception). So how would you refer to the function itself >> without calling it? > > lambda:f Doesn't help; wouldn't the lambda be implicitly called? Cheers, Chris