Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!82.197.223.106.MISMATCH!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.011 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.04; 'versions.': 0.07; 'alan': 0.09; 'creator': 0.09; 'filed': 0.09; 'received:mail-vc0-f174.google.com': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'stating': 0.09; 'statistical': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'sat,': 0.15; 'both,': 0.16; 'err': 0.16; 'gauld': 0.16; 'how,': 0.16; 'moderators.': 0.16; 'opposed,': 0.16; 'whole?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'written': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; '15,': 0.23; "i've": 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'actual': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; '"who': 0.29; 'received:209.85.220.174': 0.29; 'no,': 0.29; 'fri,': 0.30; 'point': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'says': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'or,': 0.34; 'problem,': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; "won't": 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'list.': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'speak': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'called': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'more.': 0.62; 'hear': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'to,': 0.65; 'power': 0.74; 'miss': 0.75; 'truth': 0.75; 'actually,': 0.84; 'away,': 0.84; 'democracy': 0.84; 'honesty,': 0.84; 'seldom': 0.84; 'sometimes.': 0.84; '1:47': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Xwa5aRgNSij4jT2aM2lELfVn2wqdhm8NeU9KEvyfQb4=; b=HKsYybGT/ZiR8lxU8RPyTz02u3OuPmNYYXemRYsug4K4OSvSxjtBFjLxf4BZyOHDXl Yk7zzQxY9rQuneYYavDZyE8aaP/DY4kUmSwbb/7PEJNu3fpZmOWlL2lT8LNhmk22IGEZ GQZaTSmopebxuEZrEZ8t1eUUpAMp+dHWmqzgEnVJqp6GaxsNQOUAisdQ5e3BDLfOflOR cPigOxjzBrGHqvNnofzZyO1pCXgEDuTWhZBkXJzRQeI9W6dJ6Ib3rBS/gXifgsU9K1ij irjyUip52cNn2vVuXWvHezJSbZ+ZCQej1HjP8/dN+k2t9YLm6lNT5pgiA2eafPBeqwNJ BuoA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF47416678FC5@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF4741667C1C7@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:40:41 -0400 Subject: Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? From: Dwight Hutto To: Chris Angelico Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1347684043 news.xs4all.nl 6870 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55757 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:29207 On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Dwight Hutto wrote: >> That's no problem, But some suported ad some opposed, it's a >> democracy, but a dictatorship by the moderators. How much did I err in >> their opinion of stating my opinion, in relation to the statistical >> whole? > > Actually, I've not seen any moderatorial action on this list. Savoynet Alan Gauld quotes, "Putting on my moderator's hat", sometimes. > is as you describe, a monarchy whose head but seldom exercises power; I think it's Rossenbom(or whoever the creator of the interpreter written in C is), "who says benevolent dictator for life" > python-list/c.l.p is an anarchy - or, if you like, a true democracy. Both, depending on whether you're a freestylist, or a pythonista who follows versions. > Not a representative democracy where we all get to vote, but we all > individually have the power to kick someone out - it's called a > killfile. No, only the individual can killfile, then they miss the point of someone they should be listening to, because they kill filed for propaganda, and not an actual cause(to join a group). The more people you annoy, the more people won't hear you > any more. Annoy, how, with truth and honesty, then go away, and kill file me with the few who are ignorant of the fact I speak the truth. > -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com