Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.029 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'happen,': 0.07; 'commonly': 0.09; 'received:mail-vb0-f46.google.com': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'stating': 0.09; 'statistical': 0.09; 'tends': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'accident.': 0.16; 'err': 0.16; 'means.': 0.16; 'moderators.': 0.16; 'opposed,': 0.16; 'whole?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'tend': 0.17; 'received:209.85.212.46': 0.18; 'community.': 0.20; 'all,': 0.21; 'trying': 0.21; 'people,': 0.21; 'sorry,': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'posts': 0.23; 'to:2**1': 0.23; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'guess': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'rest': 0.28; 'received:209.85.212': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; 'fine': 0.28; "i'm": 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'fri,': 0.30; 'space,': 0.32; 'docs': 0.33; 'much.': 0.33; 'text,': 0.33; 'agreed': 0.33; 'likely': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'problem,': 0.35; 'text.': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'posting': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'list,': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'help': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'kind': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'our': 0.65; 'to,': 0.65; 'reply': 0.66; 'response.': 0.67; 'cut': 0.71; 'walk': 0.71; 'adhere': 0.84; 'everything,': 0.84; 'mistakes,': 0.84; 'off,': 0.84; 'conversation': 0.91; 'mistakes': 0.95; 'bandwidth': 0.97 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=J3GHFTRaGzUFq4m49h2vBDXeaWdAKdGvURtGGtYGn4M=; b=RK+2eMFXgjQTFv5VEqTX6eVk/ZEDkWXyydFTa2UfYhFSqieOGE9gyl7zTJGOjhNsLB yNzpxotrYkzyv6Lhl6lv70UHXyttN3lYXGq5V+0WjGQbG2K7Jrmy8Iv95jWV9YzoW5H1 5nacYUY3pSozJROBzlHLqBRzl0mOAB+nei2RAgqC/u9SPrG70AkvmikdRvmf6prGwrAS Ncnm1lrMk3yUyOmlKA+J4xhY122bFyoJXSIqnz9sr/xTOFHFSw2v2lE5KxMwTL2cNbqE vU7VjhhAlIl8vtMVw39H9kslciKSR68vvsQ7ClNPulB6rIbXrk3ntCpRgmCJbSYhZEb0 LF1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF4741667C1C7@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> References: <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF47416678FC5@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF4741667C1C7@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:47:11 -0400 Subject: Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? From: Dwight Hutto To: "Prasad, Ramit" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "python-list@python.org" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 48 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1347680834 news.xs4all.nl 6923 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44621 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:29203 On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Prasad, Ramit wrote: > Dwight Hutto wrote: >> Chris Angelico wrote: >> > honest. How do you feel? Interesting... >> > >> Um, I guess like an inconsiderate bandwidth hog, but from now on I'll >> trim more text. >> >> First it was too little, and now it's too much. > > It is a fine line to walk and nobody does it perfectly all the time. > We just attempt our best. >python docs interpolation >> I just tend to cut out some or all depending on the scope of the conversation. >> >> If I just hit reply all, and send it out, it's not intentionally topython docs interpolation >> use all of the text, and utilize the extra space, it's just a >> response. >> >> If the conversation is kind of just a few people, then I trim pretty >> much everything, which apppython docs interpolationarently set a guy name mark off, who I was >> polite to, but I'm not going to get slammed for a few simple posting >> mistakes, and more than likely a few of his aliases, or the group he >> tends to cheer up with. > > Sorry, I did not mean to "slam" you by any means. I was just > notifying you of the list's commonly agreed upon etiquette and > requesting future posts to attempt to adhere to that. > >> >> It's just a mailing list, lighten up because mistakes in posting will >> happen, even by accident. >> > > It's just a mailing list, lighten up because a few people trying > to help improve your communication to the rest of the group > may come off unintentionally as being "slammed" by the community. :) > That's no problem, But some suported ad some opposed, it's a democracy, but a dictatorship by the moderators. How much did I err in their opinion of stating my opinion, in relation to the statistical whole? -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com