Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.wiretrip.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.04; 'pointer': 0.05; '+0100,': 0.07; 'something,': 0.07; '+0200,': 0.09; '21,': 0.09; '>>>>': 0.09; 'coding,': 0.09; 'down,': 0.09; 'wrong,': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; 'computing': 0.11; '>>>': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'starts': 0.15; '>>on': 0.16; 'awesome.': 0.16; 'coder': 0.16; 'hackers': 0.16; 'mrab': 0.16; "we'd": 0.16; 'code.': 0.18; 'meant': 0.18; 'fair': 0.19; 'tue,': 0.20; 'writes:': 0.20; 'language': 0.20; 'programming': 0.20; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'thu,': 0.22; 'trying': 0.23; 'etc,': 0.23; 'structured': 0.23; "what's": 0.24; 'received:209.85.212': 0.25; 'from,': 0.25; 'equivalent': 0.26; 'moving': 0.26; "i'm": 0.26; 'url:mailman': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'definition': 0.29; 'fri,': 0.29; 'originally': 0.29; 'stefan': 0.29; 'ran': 0.31; 'it.': 0.31; 'engineering': 0.31; 'meaning': 0.31; 'speaking': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'perhaps': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.33; 'things': 0.33; 'someone': 0.33; 'from:charset:iso-8859-1': 0.33; 'with.': 0.33; 'requirements': 0.33; 'uses': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'quite': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'together.': 0.36; 'should': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'url:python': 0.37; 'apr': 0.38; 'hack': 0.38; "who's": 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; 'software': 0.38; 'used': 0.38; 'hold': 0.39; 'word,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'happen': 0.61; 'media': 0.61; '2011': 0.62; 'articles': 0.67; 'economy': 0.67; 'paper': 0.68; 'here.': 0.68; 'press': 0.71; 'news': 0.77; '(and,': 0.84; 'computers.': 0.84; 'jackson': 0.84; 'mouse,': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=beVfGMdaoblX4ztwjQ3gscI0o7rroBtAVK2fnKhOu54=; b=QGvP7cqRXjev7H8ERWaMj0jm7H5HOSxwP0Yakjs8xBpl0QtpUtPvO9YuCRKn5XJJWa q8feTb4Dr8pTvidb29swXTDbju7yG64MDds5ER+3jZIv/kjPXxXxajJB8/kl8rp51o4e KzZzk1dTm5G7lIWYqq92LlZOD8j2qoYfjRKS4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=vvTYPnnkergAH0ObDsmyQMXc/kKrYSnn2C56miDBTtfQQdkxA1h6q7dPvHMLJBj9wu btaObcNXuxnbnlSOpqoN2ySegP7DvtY6Ic3lhAe8dThq7Psm/eRPvR7trQKUt3uDc97i hQMKnfgZUmtK6nPfgHSKPdgJEyCDcn2JbxXC8= Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:39:42 -0700 From: Westley =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDnez?= To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Teaching Python References: <1284d6a5-60e3-4575-a879-ba5014fd7763@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <87d3kheqgs.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <20110421135810.GA9878@Smoke> <4DB05734.8030200@mrabarnett.plus.com> <20110421223608.GB10971@Smoke> <4DB0CADC.8030909@mrabarnett.plus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4DB0CADC.8030909@mrabarnett.plus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 53 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1303436389 news.xs4all.nl 81481 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:47466 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3833 On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 01:25:00AM +0100, MRAB wrote: > On 21/04/2011 23:36, Westley Martínez wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 05:11:32PM +0100, MRAB wrote: > >>On 21/04/2011 14:58, Westley Martínez wrote: > >>>On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 06:02:08AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: > >>>>Ben Finney, 20.04.2011 02:06: > >>>>>Dan Stromberg writes: > >>>>> > >>>>>>On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:03 PM, geremy condra wrote: > >>>>>>>When you say 'hacking', you mean.... ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Presumably he meant the real meaning of the word, not what the press > >>>>>>made up and ran with. > >>>>> > >>>>>To be fair, the press already had its own pejorative meaning of “hack” > >>>>>before the engineering and computing term > >>>> > >>>>Not anywhere outside of the English language that I'm aware of, > >>>>though. In German, it's a computing-only term that's used in both > >>>>contexts by those who understand why the pointer is moving over the > >>>>screen when moving the mouse, and almost exclusively in a bad > >>>>context by those who write news paper articles (and, consequently, > >>>>by those who innocently read them). > >>>> > >>>>Stefan > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > >>> > >>>O Lord, I'd hope we'd be speaking for English here. But really, hack > >>>has always been a negative term. It's original definition is chopping, > >>>breaking down, kind of like chopping down the security on someone elses > >>>computer. Now I don't know where the term originally came from, but the > >>>definition the media uses is quite a fair use. Why should we call > >>>ourselves hackers anyways? I don't smoke. I'm no different from anyone > >>>else, I just happen to know a lot about computers. Should we call > >>>people who know a lot about the economy hackers, too, or perhaps we > >>>should call them economists.... > >> > >>As I understand it, "hacking" is about not doing the job "properly". > >>When trying to make something, a hacker will use the equivalent of duct > >>tape to hold things together. > >> > >>A computer hacker doesn't write the requirements of the software or > >>draw Jackson Structured Programming diagrams, etc, but just thinks > >>about what's needed and starts writing the code. > > > >That's a cowboy coder. > > A cowboy coder is someone who's bad at coding, a hacker is someone > who's good at it. Wrong, sir! Wrong! Cowboys are awesome.