Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.04; 'context': 0.04; 'pointer': 0.05; '+0100,': 0.07; 'something,': 0.07; 'though.': 0.07; '+0200,': 0.09; '21,': 0.09; '>>>>': 0.09; 'coding,': 0.09; 'contexts': 0.09; 'down,': 0.09; 'from:addr:python': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; 'computing': 0.11; '>>>': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'starts': 0.15; 'coder': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'hackers': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'mrab': 0.16; 'received:84.92': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122.60': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr:python-list': 0.16; "we'd": 0.16; 'code.': 0.18; 'meant': 0.18; 'fair': 0.19; 'tue,': 0.20; 'writes:': 0.20; 'language': 0.20; 'programming': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'thu,': 0.22; 'trying': 0.23; 'breaking': 0.23; 'etc,': 0.23; 'structured': 0.23; "what's": 0.24; 'from,': 0.25; 'received:84': 0.25; 'equivalent': 0.26; 'moving': 0.26; "i'm": 0.26; 'url:mailman': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'definition': 0.29; 'originally': 0.29; 'stefan': 0.29; 'ran': 0.31; 'it.': 0.31; 'engineering': 0.31; 'meaning': 0.31; 'speaking': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'perhaps': 0.32; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.32; 'screen': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.33; 'things': 0.33; 'someone': 0.33; 'with.': 0.33; 'requirements': 0.33; 'uses': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'reply- to:addr:python.org': 0.35; 'quite': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'ourselves': 0.36; 'together.': 0.36; 'should': 0.37; 'url:python': 0.37; 'apr': 0.38; 'else,': 0.38; 'hack': 0.38; "who's": 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'computer.': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; 'software': 0.38; 'used': 0.38; 'hold': 0.39; 'word,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'happen': 0.61; 'media': 0.61; '2011': 0.62; 'articles': 0.67; 'economy': 0.67; 'paper': 0.68; 'here.': 0.68; 'press': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.72; 'news': 0.77; '(and,': 0.84; 'computers.': 0.84; 'jackson': 0.84; 'mouse,': 0.84; 'tape': 0.84; 'presumably': 0.91 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlgHAJjJsE1UXebj/2dsb2JhbACEUJNCjUp3snqRAoEpg1B9BJIw Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:25:00 +0100 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Teaching Python References: <1284d6a5-60e3-4575-a879-ba5014fd7763@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <87d3kheqgs.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <20110421135810.GA9878@Smoke> <4DB05734.8030200@mrabarnett.plus.com> <20110421223608.GB10971@Smoke> In-Reply-To: <20110421223608.GB10971@Smoke> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: python-list@python.org List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 50 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1303431910 news.xs4all.nl 41103 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:43274 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3829 On 21/04/2011 23:36, Westley Martínez wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 05:11:32PM +0100, MRAB wrote: >> On 21/04/2011 14:58, Westley Martínez wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 06:02:08AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>>> Ben Finney, 20.04.2011 02:06: >>>>> Dan Stromberg writes: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:03 PM, geremy condra wrote: >>>>>>> When you say 'hacking', you mean.... ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Presumably he meant the real meaning of the word, not what the press >>>>>> made up and ran with. >>>>> >>>>> To be fair, the press already had its own pejorative meaning of “hack” >>>>> before the engineering and computing term >>>> >>>> Not anywhere outside of the English language that I'm aware of, >>>> though. In German, it's a computing-only term that's used in both >>>> contexts by those who understand why the pointer is moving over the >>>> screen when moving the mouse, and almost exclusively in a bad >>>> context by those who write news paper articles (and, consequently, >>>> by those who innocently read them). >>>> >>>> Stefan >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >>> >>> O Lord, I'd hope we'd be speaking for English here. But really, hack >>> has always been a negative term. It's original definition is chopping, >>> breaking down, kind of like chopping down the security on someone elses >>> computer. Now I don't know where the term originally came from, but the >>> definition the media uses is quite a fair use. Why should we call >>> ourselves hackers anyways? I don't smoke. I'm no different from anyone >>> else, I just happen to know a lot about computers. Should we call >>> people who know a lot about the economy hackers, too, or perhaps we >>> should call them economists.... >> >> As I understand it, "hacking" is about not doing the job "properly". >> When trying to make something, a hacker will use the equivalent of duct >> tape to hold things together. >> >> A computer hacker doesn't write the requirements of the software or >> draw Jackson Structured Programming diagrams, etc, but just thinks >> about what's needed and starts writing the code. > > That's a cowboy coder. A cowboy coder is someone who's bad at coding, a hacker is someone who's good at it.