Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '[0,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '16]': 0.16; '[x]': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'subject:Remove': 0.16; 'subject:python.': 0.16; 'tuple,': 0.16; 'unpacking': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'tend': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'tim': 0.29; 'chase': 0.31; "i'd": 0.34; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'more': 0.64; 'hardly': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: Remove comma from tuples in python. Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:14:39 +0100 Organization: None References: <8ca893cc-c010-486b-ace3-070ff7ffdac8@googlegroups.com> <20140221080032.67e536f9@bigbox.christie.dr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bdbb48.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.7.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1392992078 news.xs4all.nl 2960 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45560 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:66834 Tim Chase wrote: > With the single-value tuple, I tend to find the parens make it more > readable, so I'd go with > > [x*x for (x,) in lst] Hardly ever seen in the wild, but unpacking works with [...], too: >>> items = zip(range(5)) >>> [x*x for [x] in items] [0, 1, 4, 9, 16]