Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.106 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.79; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'assume': 0.14; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'is;': 0.16; 'said.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'do.': 0.18; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'this?': 0.23; 'earlier': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; "they'll": 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'everyone': 0.33; 'agree': 0.35; 'knows': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'dave': 0.60; 'is.': 0.60; 'physics': 0.68; 'theoretical': 0.74; 'moves': 0.84; 'subject:Platform': 0.84; 'subject:Project': 0.84; 'absolutely': 0.87; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=m2J078A8t4NoIyc1FsmkHMM6rhyuU1xGb/tlPTlWYts=; b=fWddQh5GEUewq82cT0VsCShE9msud0mypGRffDQfrbvpHH+5FRQvfnQkrGUH7eN4Ye Df9BZF2qpjhRb/pKy+GCAhgVHwKHFu5OYZtZ5JIMO2c8vbD5qP5UIpTj5db/4TOGjbH/ lXhot1thSEdtMKFMHjVPH8jo2ao3eCvJJY5gG2iIKaUlYkZDa4YbxKpDv0yG5aavq1Zu x6jt3kvKcn0hu59uvULpJbRwbRTUPiq9V8RIk3jZyPIhbi27/9ggI8M5TH9tF1rEl657 ma0lh8pSSTbd20gABopaLvZlrS7M18rDV6kRIrRZoIXIByGtAtKLAL+GPS2DICh3eVGe iNDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.112.164 with SMTP id ir4mr7085489pbb.153.1392692992113; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:09:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5302cada$0$2788$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> References: <5302cada$0$2788$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:09:51 +1100 Subject: Re: Google Cloud Platform and GlassSolver Project From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1392693377 news.xs4all.nl 2864 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46290 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:66630 On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:57:34 -0800, Physics wrote: > >> Does ANYONE have a clue how to do this? I understand that it is hard but >> geez... > > > Absolutely no clue what your question is. You seem to assume that: > > - we know what "God's algorithm" is; > > - we know what "God's Number" is; > > - we understand what you mean by 3x3s, 2x2s, 4x4s and 5x5s (five > what by five what?). They'll be Rubik's Cubes, as Dave said earlier in the thread. God's Number is the theoretical fewest-moves-to-solve, called that because you would need to be the omniscient Deity to know which moves to actually do. But I agree that it should have been said. Not everyone knows what your research is :) ChrisA