Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.021 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.09; 'lookup': 0.09; 'notation': 0.09; 'python:': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; '(last': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'values:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'math': 0.20; 'import': 0.21; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.21; "i've": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; '>>>>': 0.29; 'fri,': 0.30; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'table': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'subject:with': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'skip:6 10': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'paper': 0.78; 'agreement.': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FPlnUFA+DUMBdzJF/du8qxScTx4fxZayzM+qbteNfYE=; b=mXaC58liL9xrqhMWvRftrEy0iYJmy5Gp9XzFQkIDbEr9cspAt/MAAII1LCV0OZ49UU AhnATELUDvquNfRvtXjEU8tmTrXA1eidfMkGHWzAojmjpidVykLkgSeOgy+0aAvIUj15 TqdEOekdlByJuhLEXcjuhtnrg89N8mEIndHT1VPNjpPG0POAFGmIntSzIe8xIXQCW8Cx fv4p/T5SjtM8BGBkbqNHo0tWehSvFEbM+doeSEwlH3hA02rEwbvPy7Z0IRK2VfQ+zVsx J2OTWXBJHltaCmZFqq8wFBbzDuA1wGX6yyDTSBmAyRMJR92AnfXxlVgDaYoYL6bUv+VO 1e7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:54:15 +1000 Subject: Re: What's wrong with my arc tangens calculation? From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1347620058 news.xs4all.nl 6894 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58503 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:29150 On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:49 PM, xliiv wrote: > I do some math with python: > > import math as m > m.degrees(m.atan(2)) >>>> 63.43494882292201 > > but when i lookup tg in a paper table (last decade math book) i've got these values: > > tg(63'10'') = 1.9768 > tg(63'20'') = 1.9912 > tg(63'30'') = 2.0057 > > For me python should return something more like 63'2x'' than 63'4x''(becasue 63'30'' is higher than 2.0) According to Google: .43494882292201 degrees = 26.0969294 arcminutes So I would say that your table and Python are in agreement. Do you know what the notation 63'30" means? ChrisA