Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'subject:2.7': 0.09; 'vast': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; '2.7': 0.13; 'anyway).': 0.16; 'bugs,': 0.16; 'bugs.': 0.16; 'cares': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'contribute': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.16; 'all,': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'fix': 0.21; 'gcc': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; '(or': 0.23; 'written': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'developers': 0.26; 'linux': 0.26; 'bugs': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'volunteers': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'programmers': 0.30; 'core': 0.32; 'is?': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'why': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'personally': 0.61; 'strictly': 0.64; 'offer': 0.66; 'jul': 0.72; '9:36': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=PsxWwqkAwn4FYK8eXrMyoplhKYrJ2JmAx+yxb5Msr4k=; b=TRFOXEqSKm8FAjwxrkV0/E32A1xeKvFMVJoQiET4yDRiF9pbUQhseAVUUD4VU7r8RS 8GD30Vwt/ZllWpZIXCg9x6ZaebKhdz2A9P52B2Ap8kYUm2JCBxFe/RuFvZ+i6Xx+h1J5 18DJr7bZpFOB7k4yN3pa6PPdpJSpaRVs97vhJpz+v4SnGy0Gnd5Ymzf3grKoZPu5y/ja /y8Ex2ipRr1t9oCsGLr6Pf5a3TUFonNlork4g/t3wh9M0/irQX07gFdKm0b4xtzBBMHr 8wt2l85rCTARaQn1OzSFKKJJNGcMf/ITwgKbxlEfSmsxagsNVRa921F7B8ki9IaZOrdQ mABA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.4.1 with SMTP id 1mr24980022ioe.10.1437265669030; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 17:27:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 10:27:48 +1000 Subject: Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1437265678 news.xs4all.nl 2968 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38817 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:94077 On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > If the vast majority of Python programmers are focused on 2.7, why are > volunteers to help fix 2.7 bugs so scarce? > > Does they all consider it perfect (or sufficient) as is? > > Should the core developers who do not personally use 2.7 stop backporting, > because no one cares if they do? I use Linux on all my computers, but I wouldn't be volunteering to help fix kernel bugs, because I'm not competent to. I also compile C code now and then, but don't offer to fix GCC bugs. There may well be huge numbers of people who write Python code who don't feel they can contribute in that way (whether or not that's strictly true - after all, half of Python is written in Python anyway). ChrisA