Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: UNSURE 0.255 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.51; '*S*': 0.02; 'practice,': 0.07; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'subject:Help': 0.11; 'posted': 0.15; 'geek': 0.16; 'nowadays': 0.16; 'ourselves.': 0.16; 'reminded': 0.16; 'should.': 0.16; 'smile': 0.16; 'thursday,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'post': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '(which': 0.31; 'posting': 0.31; '13,': 0.31; "we're": 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'older': 0.33; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'no,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:one': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'turn': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'major': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'hope': 0.61; 'john': 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; 'back': 0.62; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'day.': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'here': 0.66; 'subject:. ': 0.67; 'person,': 0.68; 'deeply': 0.69; 'enjoy': 0.71; 'hoping': 0.75; 'day': 0.76; 'harmful': 0.84; 'laughed': 0.84; 'loser': 0.84; 'remarks': 0.84; 'respect.': 0.84; 'subject:here': 0.84; 'subject:you.': 0.84; 'subject:Welcome': 0.91; 'period.': 0.95 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4oBQYTgyIxY7tZ1uj6ZJKcFAH3jZbgyTbA+2Cy7iajA=; b=GF+ln3y7YC+TbSDJWkizLTG+Yx5WcoXuX+DBbbp4GfePpmiz5VWxzCKMOdlbpX5iRo Gw3rME/M1nEstJbbwep/iQAq/SbJv0uHnXflKmTZOKn5PkBhfWzJwZXqsm4Sa499nfrU V8/1zuQCs7xbGwuoBoRdNLPxDTPpM4wSkSsoVMSvS3aMo3ij/S28H6G5CkQw/PC8WKP4 L1FLqmZcxiIxpCmujBrRpnrjZ8El7T2JxzyaLg+K+4nmIMhuu9SKhW012G1UqhtUxvtL 7B7tjdx/7tjbKxJXvl/2FRF8TAt0Rk6BRuE/GDAiBchh5cleeQdbOXxh+6k6Pc0blpb6 wAHA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.99.39 with SMTP id en7mr7687319wib.10.1392314584286; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:03:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <84fcf77d-4c82-4f04-b5d6-608e31bf6aa3@googlegroups.com> References: <8355e670-5d3e-4ce1-8db1-64264a173cda@googlegroups.com> <84fcf77d-4c82-4f04-b5d6-608e31bf6aa3@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:03:04 -0500 Subject: Re: Welcome to the Internet. No one here likes you. (was: Newcomer Help) From: Larry Martell To: John Ladasky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:21:21 +0100 Cc: "python-list@python.org" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 38 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1392337282 news.xs4all.nl 2849 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56750 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:66270 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, John Ladasky wrote: > On Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:32:46 AM UTC-8, Larry....@gmail.com wrot= e: > >> This reminds me of post that was circulating in the early 90's: >> >> Welcome to the Internet. >> >> No one here likes you. >> >> We're going to offend, insult, abuse, and belittle the living hell out >> of you. And when you rail against us with "FUCK YOU YOU GEEK WIMP >> SKATER GOTH LOSER PUNK FAG BITCH!1!!", we smile to ourselves. We laugh >> at you because you don't get it. Then we turn up the heat, hoping to >> draw more entertainment from your irrational fuming. > [snip] > > Ummm... Larry, I hope you are just posting this rant because Rustom Mody'= s remarks reminded you of it. Yes, that is why I posted it. > I hope that you do not personally subscribe to this behavior. No, not any more. But that rant is a somewhat tongue in cheek look back at how things were back in the day. > Yes, I too was a bullied nerd when I was young. I don't use my history a= s an excuse to do unto others what was done unto me. No one should. No on= e should bully another person, period. It's not "entertainment," it's a de= eply harmful practice, and does not deserve any respect. Back in the day I was both a major flamer and flamee. I did enjoy being the flamer and I laughed at being flamed. And I don't equate that with being bullied in any way (which I was when I was a kid). But I am older and kinder nowadays and have better things to do with my time.