Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'indicating': 0.05; 'preference': 0.05; 'keys,': 0.07; 'parameter': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'api,': 0.16; 'confusion': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'world!")': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; "shouldn't": 0.17; 'keys': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'subject:please': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'far,': 0.29; 'sense': 0.31; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'thanks': 0.34; 'received:org': 0.36; 'michael': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'object': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'further': 0.61; 'personally': 0.61; 'our': 0.65; 'alternative.': 0.84; 'replies.': 0.84; 'target.': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: 10 sec poll - please reply! Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:31:49 +0000 References: <3d71f175-164e-494c-a521-2eaa5679b524@googlegroups.com> <7290a127-97e1-4032-98ae-6e602b87b74b@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-92-24-212-75.ppp.as43234.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: <7290a127-97e1-4032-98ae-6e602b87b74b@googlegroups.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121119-1, 19/11/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1353428995 news.xs4all.nl 6970 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47714 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:33635 On 20/11/2012 15:18, Michael Herrmann wrote: > Thanks again for your further replies. So far, it's 4 votes for 'send_keys' and 1 vote for 'type'. > > Regarding 'send_keys': To me personally it makes sense to send keys _to_ something. However, in our API, send_keys would not be called on an object or with a parameter indicating the target. It would just be > > send_keys(ENTER) > send_keys("Hello World!") > send_keys(CTRL + 'a') In that case I'd just call it keys, that shouldn't cause too much confusion :) Though keys_pressed comes to mind as an alternative. > > Does that change your preference for 'send_keys'? > > Thanks a lot!!! > -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.