Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'string.': 0.05; 'string': 0.09; 'bold': 0.09; 'oh,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'literals': 0.16; 'slow,': 0.16; 'string:': 0.16; 'subject:bit': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'propose': 0.24; 'skip:l 30': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'that.': 0.31; 'noted': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; 'skip:s 30': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; '14,': 0.36; 'edge': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'changing': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'handle': 0.38; 'capital': 0.73; 'ethan': 0.84; 'furman': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=DSHCR9ZXwiGYPCDBPlTOiDP3xohP7Bp/n2JaukWuKCY=; b=i5EudRPSZ63u4u+klsi+2gqEsfVRDkRthMK9GZNyZmHfbPKk8wgwBPeyThTRqCW4gJ DJEwjZgTSOlUoiypPF+WftJ+q+0eNH6sfOGCoaLNTAGmECTvfZezU1cR1vG8sFIg3av0 noXMzKZyd06ZRmZ0V9eEn8+hafj4exqoxcL2J9UjXOCSYgzGlVq2Gc4OtsSkEucRpEA7 M9u/1P5Bn6q/dI2xOHY0s0aQnv+t+uiN1reIIobWxpPUQQv0TD1Cxz9ywJjc/oMFuMTf bh77lH1CrJUB4+UkP0j+h62l7fjGzs50Q7e2OjT3E/DwYGd0l1De1mCCDkE8HTucBUC1 QFIw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.118.71 with SMTP id kk7mr4645878pab.14.1392329608920; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:13:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FD3A3B.1060300@stoneleaf.us> References: <4cc09129-43ee-4205-a24c-03f92b594abc@googlegroups.com> <52FD3A3B.1060300@stoneleaf.us> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:13:28 +1100 Subject: Re: A curious bit of code... From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1392330021 news.xs4all.nl 2869 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47125 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:66262 On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: > Oh, it's not that bad! All you have to do is handle the edge case of an > empty string: > > s[::len(s)-1 if s else True] > > *ducks and runs* And the edge case of the one-character string. Also, it's been noted that calling the built-in function len() is slow, so I propose changing that. s[::(sys.getsizeof("\N{MATHEMATICAL BOLD CAPITAL L}"+s)-sys.getsizeof("\N{MATHEMATICAL BOLD CAPITAL E}\N{MATHEMATICAL BOLD CAPITAL N}") or 4)//4] Note the elegance of using the word LEN across two string literals (because string literals are fast) as a means of clearly describing what we are doing - an optimization of the built-in len() function. ChrisA