Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.043 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'bicycle': 0.16; 'cons': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'simplest': 0.16; ':-)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'las': 0.37; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'subject.': 0.74; 'again?': 0.84 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:05:57 -0700 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131118 Thunderbird/17.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: singleton ... again References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 7 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1392242786 news.xs4all.nl 2924 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53155 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:66103 On 02/11/2014 09:34 PM, Asaf Las wrote: > playing a bit with subject. > > pros and cons of this approach? did i create bicycle again? :-) I always thought sticking an object in a module is the simplest form of singleton.