Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'modified': 0.05; 'think,': 0.05; 'ascii': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'python': 0.07; 'bytes,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; 'slightly': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'subject:python': 0.15; 'earlier,': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'removal.': 0.16; 'jan': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'fixed': 0.27; 'string': 0.29; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'unicode': 0.29; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'actually': 0.34; 'there': 0.35; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'problems': 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'strings': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'no.': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'back': 0.61; 'kept': 0.73; 'subject:better': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: is python 3 better than python 2? Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:04:59 -0400 References: <4d9b7eaa$0$10570$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rain.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <4d9b7eaa$0$10570$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1302066608 news.xs4all.nl 32470 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:39441 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:2688 On 4/5/2011 4:42 PM, John Nagle wrote: > Well, actually Unicode support went in back around Python 2.4. Even earlier, I think, but there were and still are problems with unicode in 2.x. Some were and will only be fixed in 3.x. > In 3.x, ASCII strings went away, but that was more of a removal. Yes and no. They were kept slightly modified as bytes, with all of the string methods kept. -- Terry Jan Reedy