Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Antoon Pardon Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Is there an meaning of '[[]]' in a list? Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:04:03 +0100 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <750e1071-395b-4e9b-ad64-05faa174a5bf@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de tG5OZJyaG8QQ/Y0YlTOuXAdTpkNCK+VLPJNoSVNQcJFQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.097 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.81; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:134': 0.05; 'thu,': 0.15; 'received:ac.be': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'text,': 0.22; 'tried': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'subject:list': 0.26; 'idea': 0.28; 'tutorial': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'received:be': 0.30; 'probably': 0.31; 'post': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'problem': 0.33; 'him.': 0.33; 'surprised': 0.33; 'next': 0.35; 'nov': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'agree': 0.37; 'seem': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'questions': 0.40; 'ten': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'determine': 0.61; 'here.': 0.62; 'course': 0.62; 'subject:there': 0.66; 'experiment': 0.84; 'otten': 0.84; 'schreef': 0.84 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvAHAGyUVVaGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABehFcBwFmDPYJSAoIOAQEBAQEBhUABAQQjVRELGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFEwgCiCqtUYwOhCUBAQgCIYEBhVOEfoUngk6BRAEEllWNMoFbhzSPV4NyY4IRHYFXhh0BAQE User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:99437 Op 23-11-15 om 09:57 schreef Peter Otten: > Quivis wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:40:17 +0100, Peter Otten wrote: >> >>> those questions that are a little harder >> And just how is he going to determine what is hard? > Note that I said "a little harder", not "hard". > > Write down your next ten or so questions, then work through the tutorial or > another introductory text, then use a search engine, then post the one or > two questions that are still unanswered. The problem is of course that he may already be doing that. We have just no idea about which questions he solved for himself because those are not mentioned here. But I do agree that he probably should try harder, he doesn't seem to come with the result of an experiment he tried where the result surprised him. -- Antoon.