Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.franciliens.net!news.muarf.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.081 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.00; 'expense': 0.09; 'subject:module': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'sqlite': 0.16; 'subject:access': 0.16; 'sure.': 0.16; 'subject:python': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'mon,': 0.24; 'non': 0.24; "haven't": 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'related': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'quite': 0.32; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'accessing': 0.36; 'sequence': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'las': 0.37; 'tasks': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'major': 0.40; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'carefully': 0.74; 'increasing': 0.74; 'manner.': 0.74; 'behavior': 0.77; 'spawned': 0.84; 'subject:SQL': 0.84; 'subject:recommended': 0.84; 'simulation': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=rwn749nJRwpbxVR+2sNMhJyW52PZQ1Fyislz+pN0gVE=; b=Iq/6f6tC+y7WZlt2B4SafLUWdfc15miLmz8cwL9pkE8BqUKKB4rkEfabpGvoCFOzlo 2VaOhm8SED/J4vQ7szdaBs2Sq3xNYbxeBGcJtDbt8ZPlso9A7xyAbAev18g1E6SNxka2 GwKhpu6eQeyXCEzfTEWzYzT8tUudVOlpWckufVS5gV8mMizOR8APPfllVwz8nLQIbFMW JSRKj2l+FFiRtY88LQ74AlOoiDkw3tJBWnFrWemJ23EDuckCW+6PRc2LQK0m351fq58w CzCtBA3Z8oxgkO50Mx9oxL2y7zWUu6KEWUSYar+c8DqjXa48UPOybAZs83QAwaE6vOl1 Pk7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.182.165 with SMTP id ef5mr159837pbc.169.1391952985900; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:36:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <12584a07-33ea-4c12-846c-6b336ce002a1@googlegroups.com> References: <12584a07-33ea-4c12-846c-6b336ce002a1@googlegroups.com> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:36:25 +1100 Subject: Re: What is the recommended python module for SQL database access? From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1391952989 news.xs4all.nl 2889 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58819 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:65757 On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Asaf Las wrote: > i did it just to test sqlite3 behavior and actually test was related to > simulation of unique incremental sequence number/counter for > independently spawned tasks accessing counter in non deterministic manner. Sure. I would expect that you'd get steadily increasing sequence IDs, but that they might be a major bottleneck. SQLite is (far as I can tell, at least - haven't personally tested it) quite solid with its locking; at the expense of performance, but carefully reliable. ChrisA