Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <dreamingforward@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.064
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.87; '*S*': 0.00; 'rewrite': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'fine.': 0.16; 'iteration': 0.16; 'loops': 0.16; 'mess,': 0.16; 'operator.': 0.16; 'subject:recursion': 0.16; 'ternary': 0.16; 'to:name:python list': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'programming': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'fixed': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'ones.': 0.31; 'styles': 0.31; 'possible.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'functional': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'easy': 0.60; 'is.': 0.60; 'total': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'design.': 0.68; 'overall': 0.69; 'secret': 0.74; 'steps.': 0.91; 'washington': 0.93
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BXQpJv7mIM6UXD1SsVGPGkW0p9oQ9P7BnydhOZLAldU=; b=UQspxDUo+Pj4Z12hOWKxLu1jdjgWqUoh+th5SKVbsH+jVHABmvuT7MYb5KyxUMgddo LhC2ZtTVMYrzmNiFALFtxpBfwtLbyC4TRatJCLKLqo1Rz/4ZUwsCd0i7JtTddCpbdOUI SOS0LorkfxHNeZIr/adOSAysjAT/D0F/w1jxZ1/Sc+LcPyUX0nqDLmzR0b9VwN0BVDAQ AtDZV2JErOAl9PMp8ho7ESU5aw69D0c9OkPOXViNcrvm5dYLd9tQ/iEsjW5Ez7y2S0sR BOMtQEocNpuUJBlXrqAEd+r75+WIldYFGCulFXd1jm9IHkcv0FymYYLKoQ4vEsyY0RN1 xjGw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.240.197 with SMTP id wc5mr4258738wjc.23.1380749980103; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1380717085.6985.29063445.6AD889D5@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <l2feu0$n61$1@ger.gmane.org> <1380717085.6985.29063445.6AD889D5@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:39:40 -0700
Subject: Re: Tail recursion to while iteration in 2 easy steps
From: Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com>
To: Python List <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.653.1380749987.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1380749987 news.xs4all.nl 15931 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39723
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:55383

>> Part of the reason that Python does not do tail call optimization is
>> that turning tail recursion into while iteration is almost trivial, once
>> you know the secret of the two easy steps. Here it is.
>
> That should be a reason it _does_ do it - saying people should rewrite
> their functions with loops means declaring that Python is not really a
> multi-paradigm programming language but rather rejects functional
> programming styles in favor of imperative ones.

Yes, but that's fine.  A PL language that includes every programming
paradigm would be a total mess, if even possible.  Python has
functional programming where it does not conflict with its overall
design.  The only place I find that this is not the case is with
lambda, but that is now adequately fixed with the addition of the
ternary operator.

-- 
MarkJ
Tacoma, Washington