Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.058 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.00; 'cryptic': 0.16; 'discussed.': 0.16; 'discussion.': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'trying': 0.22; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'bit': 0.23; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'example': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'actual': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'oop': 0.29; 'no,': 0.29; 'maybe': 0.31; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.35; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.35; 'subject:: ': 0.37; '(with': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'here.': 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'spur': 0.84; 'sorry.': 0.91 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 14:52:56 -0600 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: different types of inheritence... References: <544f53cb-e404-41a4-aa2e-0db27c845546@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 5 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1432673588 news.xs4all.nl 2956 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35812 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:91265 On 05/26/2015 08:57 AM, zipher wrote: > Comprende? I'm not trying to be cryptic here. This is a bit of OOP > theory to be discussed. No, sorry. Maybe an actual example (with use case) would spur discussion.