Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
From: "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com>
To: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Subject: RE: pythonOCC examples doesn't work?
Thread-Topic: pythonOCC examples doesn't work?
Thread-Index: AQHNkJvQl5TJS+Ob40+mDKpyEMjll5eGhSKAgAAKqwCAAATmAIAACdoAgAJGtbA=
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:26:12 +0000
References: <af4c9164-238f-4a94-8ed1-7c767f8c51bf@googlegroups.com> <k2para$298$1@ger.gmane.org> <CA+vVgJVgPVMNWYEQjVhj0zGko9ztjeaXdSQ-J19Xaqsn0-vCUg@mail.gmail.com> <k2pe2q$rul$1@ger.gmane.org> <CA+vVgJWesP_O1SgSt7qCAV-NshQH7-omQH+oiLFYw9nXtx+q0w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+vVgJWesP_O1SgSt7qCAV-NshQH7-omQH+oiLFYw9nXtx+q0w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.649.1347578791.27098.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 46
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:29088

Dwight Hutto wrote:=0D=0A=0D=0A[snip]=0D=0A=0D=0A> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at =
3:37 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo=2Eco=2Euk>=0D=0A> wrote: =0D=0A=
=0D=0A[snip]=0D=0A=0D=0A>  Others would be able to see this for themselves =
but=0D=0A> > you insist on sending email without context=2E  Please don't d=
o this=2E=0D=0A> =0D=0A> How are my emails without context? I'm referring t=
he OP to the docs,=0D=0A> as well as posts related to their question=2E It =
goes to use google, and=0D=0A> RTFM, and putting it politely to them=2E=0D=
=0A> =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AI have noticed that you do not always quote what you=
 are talking about=2E=0D=0ASometimes I can guess or look at another message=
 and see what you=0D=0Aare talking about, but not always=2E This list philo=
sophy seems to be=0D=0A "quote what is relevant and trim what is not"=2E No=
t on a=0D=0A"go lookup the previous message to find context"=2E =0D=0A=0D=
=0A> I could summarize, but they have to do the real reading=2E I'm not=0D=
=0A> researching this, and if I was, I'd charge for the time=2E This is to=
=0D=0A> show that things can get complex if you don't use google, or read t=
he=0D=0A> docs=2E=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AContext is not the same as explaining ab=
solutely everything=2E=0D=0AIt means that I, the reader, can see *what* you=
 are talking about =0D=0Aand what you are responding *to*=2E =0D=0A=0D=0AI =
do agree with the stance not to spoon feed OP(s)=2E=0D=0A=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Wh=
y does the OP keep asking here, when there are answers out there=2E=0D=0A> =
especially on the pywin list, which Windows users are usually referred=0D=
=0A> to=2E=0D=0A=0D=0AI was not aware that Windows users were "usually" ref=
erred anywhere=2E=0D=0AMost referrals are on a case-by-case basis as many p=
roblems or =0D=0Aquestions from Windows Python developers are Python questi=
ons and=0D=0Anot specific to pywin=2E=0D=0A=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Please point out=
 what's out of context=2E The links and references place=0D=0A> it into con=
text if the OP finds them useful, and I believe I searched=0D=0A> well for =
them=2E=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Would the OP like to tell me I wasn't helpful? Becau=
se now they're=0D=0A> probably on a search to figure out how to make these =
compatible, which=0D=0A> means more questions, and more reading=2E=0D=0A=0D=
=0ANobody is claiming you are not helpful=2E I appreciate your effort,=0D=
=0AI just do not always know what is going on in a thread especially =0D=0A=
if I see the thread jump to something I can contribute to but now have =0D=
=0Ano context with which to help=2E Not to mention that the archive for =0D=
=0Athis list is searchable=2E Your answer is much more useful for future =
=0D=0Asearchers if you leave some context for someone reading this=2E=0D=0A=
=0D=0A[snip]=0D=0A=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Let's not argue about this, I was pointin=
g them to what I saw as the=0D=0A> best possible resources to overcome his =
current problem, and it was=0D=0A> all in context of the conversation as fa=
r as I'm concerned=2E=0D=0A> =0D=0A=0D=0AIt is in context of the "thread", =
but the context of the =0D=0A"conversation" was lost=2E=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ATh=
is email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and=0D=0Acond=
itions including on offers for the purchase or sale of=0D=0Asecurities, acc=
uracy and completeness of information, viruses,=0D=0Aconfidentiality, legal=
 privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,=0D=0Aavailable at http://www=2Ejp=
morgan=2Ecom/pages/disclosures/email=2E