Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.023 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'indicating': 0.05; 'preference': 0.05; 'parameter': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'api,': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'world!")': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'module': 0.19; 'keys': 0.22; 'own.': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'subject:please': 0.27; 'far,': 0.29; 'received:192.168.1.3': 0.29; 'sense': 0.31; 'received:84': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'version': 0.34; 'thanks': 0.34; 'michael': 0.36; 'wanted': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'uses': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'object': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'further': 0.61; 'personally': 0.61; 'our': 0.65; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'replies.': 0.84; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.84; 'target.': 0.84 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=BusfMPr5 c=1 sm=1 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=1EKJ2blYo8kA:10 a=nmIkVC-shn4A:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=TZ7Uv4bapBoA:10 a=-bTHDvKTA1i_9yr_FaIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 X-AUTH: mrabarnett:2500 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:59:44 +0000 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: 10 sec poll - please reply! References: <3d71f175-164e-494c-a521-2eaa5679b524@googlegroups.com> <7290a127-97e1-4032-98ae-6e602b87b74b@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <7290a127-97e1-4032-98ae-6e602b87b74b@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: python-list@python.org List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1353427185 news.xs4all.nl 6859 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51016 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:33627 On 2012-11-20 15:18, Michael Herrmann wrote: > Thanks again for your further replies. So far, it's 4 votes for 'send_keys' and 1 vote for 'type'. > > Regarding 'send_keys': To me personally it makes sense to send keys _to_ something. However, in our API, send_keys would not be called on an object or with a parameter indicating the target. It would just be > > send_keys(ENTER) > send_keys("Hello World!") > send_keys(CTRL + 'a') > > Does that change your preference for 'send_keys'? > Calling it "send_keys" does have precedent. There's a module called SendKeys which uses the SendKeys system call in Windows. Unfortunately, the last version was for Python 2.6. When I wanted the functionality for Python 3.3 I had to write my own.