Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.81.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.016
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.04; 'explicitly': 0.05; 'say,': 0.05; 'deemed': 0.09; 'useless': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; '"view': 0.16; 'do!': 0.16; 'false)': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'inserting': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'subject:] ': 0.20; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; '(or': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'michael': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'to?': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'gives': 0.31; 'usually': 0.31; 'sites.': 0.31; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'impression': 0.36; 'maintained': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'massive': 0.38; 'how': 0.40; 'future': 0.60; 'break': 0.61; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'published': 0.71; 'therefore': 0.72; 'discover': 0.82; 'fourth': 0.84; 'convenience,': 0.91; 'luxury': 0.91; 'subject:+': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=Dgti8d/OhtN3HQvjjM9UEH7BAnw5R/SwRItSfgu24XQ=; b=wkYUNjotN69tStCOuDJ1XxhA352dyatjWGSRueWDdfbAqC1+lRkDPB+4dSz9CgaaT7 gImLm1e8ZtOP+jMEor2W+FJ4JcpgCM7sbQdCyIbuw3lEFpuEGVLq4Ijzua8uozntsTJg zlXwmTqSIQU0m6coJaW0bW+axGzpLuxBmUNklV3OFoF31mBm2shM2h9sTb3PRQYksWod +G0t9HJ0pyBjodnJqaUjNPCCKC9GLfB3YvHUvMDv2m14Mas2eNPMPtseRTaI74hnBWIT cjNud4nhc/+a9CspVjwrrW7m/xc7lFK5BJ6ZthQA9nFJzGeOKMhMB9KSCAuo6wBm9byD qIQQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.201.10 with SMTP id jw10mr45045999pbc.25.1391530726146; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:18:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52F107BC.4090203@gmail.com>
References: <be8b076d-6974-4090-bc05-e8da1376c88c@googlegroups.com> <lcokef$e9o$1@dont-email.me> <e27a8c6e-2403-402f-ac3f-ea6f31f8c8d9@googlegroups.com> <lcoon0$901$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.6369.1391468219.18130.python-list@python.org> <9aafd758-8c54-4abf-9ac4-46e970158131@googlegroups.com> <mailman.6390.1391524803.18130.python-list@python.org> <777aae72-b8f1-499a-84a5-197285847042@googlegroups.com> <52F107BC.4090203@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 03:18:45 +1100
Subject: Re: [OT] Usage of U+00B6 PILCROW SIGN
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.6394.1391530736.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1391530736 news.xs4all.nl 2930 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33961
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:65435

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 08:21 AM, wxjmfauth@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Useless and really ugly.
>
> How do you recommend we discover the anchor links for linking to?

Same way you usually do! By right clicking, hitting "View Source", and
poking around until you find the right place!

I've done exactly that with innumerable web sites. It's a massive
luxury to have them explicitly published like that; as well as the
convenience, it gives an impression (whether that's true or false)
that the hash links are deemed important and will therefore be
maintained in the future (unlike, say, a system that has
"http://..../....#s4" for the fourth (or fifth) section - inserting a
section above this one will break my link)

ChrisA
.