Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Grant Edwards Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: OT: limit number of connections from browser to my server? Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 14:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de g5irRvFeHFbxJEL/29yaEg+wPtWj2mp0XcTOm47gI6rg== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:number': 0.07; 'https': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:qwest.net': 0.09; 'spec': 0.09; 'thread': 0.10; 'explicitly': 0.15; ':o)': 0.16; 'jmp': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:limit': 0.16; 'subject:server': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'large,': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.26; 'device': 0.28; 'cpu': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'generally': 0.32; 'german': 0.32; 'http': 0.33; 'open': 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'asking': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'say': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'drop': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'subject:from': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'customer': 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.62; 'accessed': 0.66; 'obvious': 0.76; 'edwards': 0.91; 'emotional': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:108743 On 2016-05-17, jmp wrote: > I don't have time to read the whole thread but if I got it right, > the main CPU consuming part is the crypto. Yep. > Why not drop the https part an support only http ? Product spec explicitly states HTTPS only. I'm told that is not open for discussion. The customer is a large, somewhat bureaucratic German corporation, and they generally mean it when they say something is non-negotiable. > Is is a device that needs to be accessed in untrusted networks? > Sorry for asking the obvious :o) -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'm EMOTIONAL at now because I have gmail.com MERCHANDISING CLOUT!!