Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.042 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; '-1)': 0.09; 'so?': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'although,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'integer,': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'types,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; '31,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'that.': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'fri,': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'in.': 0.36; 'same.': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'quote': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'smith': 0.68; 'ethan': 0.84; 'furman': 0.84; 'same,': 0.91; 'subject:True': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=3FqCHP0pyV5+h1fiD9xzeOQa3nkw5C1+hhQlXBj6lUw=; b=0xPMXOd9cLjWEt361r45QdUPp/yONIm76TUJtIwS8GA9Lq4kDbVLQhQBEPRSGuP870 pVId7/V3k7HqJrQRS1BdF/04Y0AH0jrRnP9sHkWIUten8WnZWvD2dTO/lDmqEUDChAbZ xAk/eFJaXOnNPYk2z+LWu6wLB7svq8t8f+MSwRm5nfo0Rz24pd2w+0woZ9cqI9H0FgHX iXeeDOAJBab/OOCpEbzrSHsn2CEfVRbexdDeDv2l/hRN+bmxZQgMBARStvvdkhXjuhhN tVv/bR5TpFcKvESrPLRS+xSNL37fLedGPlKhx4MuVZC3qFATzL8PhlRINV5o7+AzFaWJ gTPQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.201.10 with SMTP id jw10mr16347475pbc.25.1391111301924; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:48:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52EAA669.4030300@stoneleaf.us> References: <99b0aa22-5fb3-460a-a080-dacb1c0f2fda@googlegroups.com> <3dcdc95d-5e30-46d3-b558-afedf9723c7c@googlegroups.com> <52ea6b0f$0$29972$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <7b41606f-4027-4470-b158-62f81b4e945c@googlegroups.com> <52EAA669.4030300@stoneleaf.us> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:48:21 +1100 Subject: Re: 1 > 0 == True -> False From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1391111305 news.xs4all.nl 2907 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40441 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:65043 Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: > On 01/30/2014 11:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Roy Smith wrote: >>> >>> >>> Yes, that's probably how I would write that, although, this is even >>> simpler: >>> >>> (x > -1) and (y >= 5) >> >> >> Be careful; that's not the same thing. > > > How so? > Well, if x is an integer, then they're the same. If it's floating point, I think they're the same, but don't quote me on that. But for arbitrary types, there's no way of knowing what x+1 will result in. ChrisA