Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '(at': 0.04; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'attribute': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:module': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'language.': 0.14; 'easier.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'seconds.': 0.16; 'strftime': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'print': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'either.': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'least': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; 'easier': 0.31; 'figure': 0.32; 'plain': 0.33; 'skip:t 40': 0.33; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'method': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'mentioned': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'smith': 0.68; 'discover': 0.82; "shouldn't,": 0.84; 'received:89': 0.85; 'wanting': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Another surprise from the datetime module Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:03:17 +0000 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-89-240-160-29.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1391105019 news.xs4all.nl 2950 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53719 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:65031 On 30/01/2014 17:32, Roy Smith wrote: > I was astounded just now to discover that datetime.timedelta doesn't > have a replace() method (at least not in Python 2.7). Is there some > fundamental reason why it shouldn't, or is this just an oversight? > > My immediate use case was wanting to print a timedelta without the > fractions of seconds. The most straight-forward is: > > print td.replace(microseconds=0) > > but that doesn't work. Yes, I know I can use strftime, but (as I've > mentioned before :-)), that requires dragging up the reference page to > figure out what grotty little format string I need. The brute-force > > print timedelta(seconds=int(td.total_seconds())) > > is easier than that, but plain old replace() would be even easier. > datetime.timedelta doesn't have a strftime method either. AttributeError: 'datetime.timedelta' object has no attribute 'strftime' -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence