Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!194.134.4.91.MISMATCH!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'algorithm': 0.04; 'modified': 0.07; 'immutable': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'assume': 0.14; 'does,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'janssen': 0.16; 'subject:howto': 0.16; 'subject:remove': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '(but': 0.19; 'code,': 0.22; 'mon,': 0.24; '15,': 0.26; 'second': 0.26; 'gets': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'needed.': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '-0700,': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'copying': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'done,': 0.36; 'earth': 0.36; 'turn': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'strictly': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'characters,': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wD28cF+ABdCSnhJ0Xj8urJNel/sp0PZEcUWiCI1DGzo=; b=gmggV8hh/R0sg8THRfXYJaRwKrBnW/sQ9buKmaYdxn9oDGZCv+hJsrNMahT3TcPBy1 coUyDdWlB0yE1D4AZu4gYIqAenjG22oMs/VD5DjtKB5+Dqfch3s9M9gdJ5tW5t7f8hRZ 8rLatyHDvemrbj/ppHdSOLlJElEWCytcLLdQe68MRxD1zwX6KaGRvBtMYTwZRtX51QSo GnqixO8zQ0SwPM4AlCquZsk1pm/8kEpc7UIMFcA/kCjHTPhRW2IiytSP5aEyLqx2NAZT G/R7FgvMSCq+dJMLDAR5NknaCEt+AXfKu25DShEUVuAVx11KhWlUV1LDPO4tJcY3Ax66 9Ddw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.50.7 with SMTP id y7mr14759972ven.24.1365989357728; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:29:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <516b5471$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> References: <201304150257331336590@gmail.com> <516b49dc$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <516b5471$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:29:17 +1000 Subject: Re: howto remove the thousand separator From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1365989366 news.xs4all.nl 2649 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59343 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:43592 On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:44:28 -0700, Mark Janssen wrote: >> What on earth makes you think that is an O(n**2) algorithm and not O(n)? > > Python *might* optimize the first concatenation, '' + 'fe', to just reuse > 'fe', (but it might not). Let's assume it does, so that no copying is > needed. Then it gets to the second concatenation, and now it has to copy > characters, because strings are immutable and cannot be modified in > place. There are actually a lot of optimizations done, so it might turn out to be O(n) in practice. But strictly in the Python code, yes, this is definitely O(n*n). ChrisA