Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.149 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.73; '*S*': 0.03; 'subject:missing': 0.07; 'statements': 0.09; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'subject:python': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'post': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'comments': 0.31; 'but': 0.35; 'c++': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; "you're": 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; 'personal': 0.63; 'fact.': 0.84; 'offended': 0.84; 'subject:here': 0.84; 'emotional': 0.91 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:52:40 -0700 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: buggy python interpretter or am I missing something here? References: <52e600ab$0$29542$862e30e2@ngroups.net> <52e60e69$0$29774$862e30e2@ngroups.net> <52e627bb$0$29811$862e30e2@ngroups.net> In-Reply-To: <52e627bb$0$29811$862e30e2@ngroups.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 7 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1390846786 news.xs4all.nl 2873 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46259 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:64879 On 01/27/2014 02:32 AM, me wrote: > You feel better now that you too have vented? Sorry but the emotional intent you're reading in to Chris's post is completely misplaced. I don't know why you chose to be offended by it. Chris's comments about C++ are accurate, but not intended to be a personal affront to you. They are just statements of fact.