Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'syntax': 0.04; 'subject:missing': 0.07; 'except:': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'undefined': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '"python': 0.16; 'behavior,': 0.16; 'help;': 0.16; 'points:': 0.16; 'subject:python': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; "shouldn't": 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'quickly': 0.29; 'then.': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'asked': 0.31; 'yields': 0.31; 'c++': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:173': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'lose': 0.68; 'satisfied': 0.81; 'it"': 0.84; 'subject:here': 0.84; 'attitude': 0.91; 'received:gateway02.websitewelcome.com': 0.91 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:17:29 -0800 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: buggy python interpretter or am I missing something here? References: <52e600ab$0$29542$862e30e2@ngroups.net> In-Reply-To: <52e600ab$0$29542$862e30e2@ngroups.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3304.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 173.12.184.233 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([173.12.184.233]) [173.12.184.233]:49769 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3IzMzA0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1390808500 news.xs4all.nl 2843 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55578 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:64845 On 01/26/2014 10:46 PM, me wrote: > > [...] I'm satisfied that the except: syntax yields > undefined behavior, and in my mind it shouldn't be > syntactically allowed then. Two points: 1) Python is not C++ 2) You asked for help; you received it. Coming back with an attitude of "Python must be broken, I'll work around it" is going to quickly lose you the support of those willing to help again.