Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.011 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; "subject:' ": 0.07; '[1,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'jan': 0.12; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'main():': 0.16; 'subject:between': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'function': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '25,': 0.31; 'concern': 0.31; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'pm,': 0.38; 'around.': 0.60; 'referred': 0.60; 'hang': 0.67; 'safe.': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=RXyFGk7S3vJknZfmsUcl5eaprwJ9le4kpBhiAVelmc0=; b=R2WyjRr44wwSueiZh/H36B0DOR4ecXo5KfUwyxWUYYMf0gulpxz/iaKLwVocehZhYR DX80o3gTk0SS8HKDAF9UtQHezJLK7vQXQ5cLp9/o3I/i4NqqCDPV/qStRfXfWWDEKpUg sT7OxykRxUBDKqUkHI6GOmPR1zUcJsCB2LbLT3fPZkkpXymx1Qvw0TZhnOGBr4kFV5hc YcxOr2nJ2LTp5elad+riSbj4Y7IOn0LBMa55B6AACFJrJGAF1CikZrm2Pg3s6xw00a24 VaPylyLVCzUOZ4V1a64RjeW80eP1Ws5ftWoLH37UMjKmNC521h8Mn72DhJzh7Sr9FQ25 Q0tg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.204.4 with SMTP id ku4mr18560379pbc.66.1390632238833; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:43:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6ad4232c-a8d9-4195-9edd-65c0e35923a7@googlegroups.com> References: <6ad4232c-a8d9-4195-9edd-65c0e35923a7@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:43:58 +1100 Subject: Re: should I transfer 'iterators' between functions? From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1390632242 news.xs4all.nl 2921 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44565 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:64726 On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:37 PM, wrote: > take the following as an example, which could work well. > But my concern is, will list 'l' be deconstructed after function return? and then iterator point to nowhere? > > def test(): > l = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] > return iter(l) > def main(): > for i in test(): > print(i) Perfectly safe. Python guarantees that nothing can ever point to "nowhere"; everything that might be looking for something else will hold a reference to it, so the thing referred to will hang around. ChrisA