Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: alex wright <wrightalexw@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Guido sees the light: PEP 8 updated
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:21:59 -0400
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <mailman.59.1460835499.6324.python-list@python.org>
References: <5711c1b3$0$1596$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <dne6huFi9sfU1@mid.individual.net> <87shym6kpo.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CAPTjJmrq-pFDGS14PE+FXx=B+fXBD-Pkqc9JdQrjULR9aXRSxg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.43.1460795561.6324.python-list@python.org> <87h9f26ioa.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <1460809922.1918014.580580553.0AE05EE4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CACwCsY5EG_RFHe8DMF4VStYCsSuO-gMC+KRx05q9=vu8aa3K9g@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.50.1460818461.6324.python-list@python.org> <878u0d7az5.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CACwCsY5fLxQqG80POb=notQdC1T5crarf_aQ2VBkCT2fwZM-2Q@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.54.1460825978.6324.python-list@python.org> <netvf2$oin$1@dont-email.me> <CAJpBq5O4wfaid-p7NJY+T-Yz1i-gRj5G-wfNN+W0R16_uKUzKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
In-Reply-To: <netvf2$oin$1@dont-email.me>
Precedence: list
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:107109

We employ a pretty hard limit of 100.  This way I can reliably have 1
module split vertically with a test or configuration file open or 3
separate modules, etc.  I find 80 to be a bit strict, although in the past
I've been in unfortunate environments where it was helpful.  The rest of
PEP8 is largely adhered to wherever possible and it's been wonderful.  When
I first came to the project it had no real standard and was mostly
formatted at the whims of the one dev working on it.  It was a mess.  The
team has grown significantly internationally and a codified standard not
rooted in any of our habits is great.

(I've never replied to this list so I hope I don't goof up.)

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:18 PM, BartC <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:

> On 16/04/2016 17:58, Larry Martell wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> I have worked for many companies where you are required to get a clean
>>>> run of pep8 on your code before your pull request will even be
>>>> considered for approval. I don't agree with this at all, as I think it
>>>> makes the code very ugly, especially enforcing the max line length.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Agh, I was with you until your last remark.
>>>
>>> A max line length of 79 characters is among the *only* rigorous
>>> principles I judge coding style on.
>>>
>>> It comes with the maxim that one function must be visible at once on the
>>> screen.
>>>
>>
>> if we still had 1970's 80 character TTYs that would matter but on my
>> 29" 1920x1080 screen it doesn't.
>>
>
> There are reasons why 'broadsheet' newspapers don't have a single wide
> column spanning the entire width of the page, but are divided into multiple
> columns.
>
> (But I think 80 columns is a bit limited. Maybe 100 or 132.)
>
> --
> Bartc
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>



-- 
"On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the
machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
rightly
to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a
question."

-Charles Babbage, 19th century English mathematician, philosopher, inventor
and mechanical engineer who originated the concept of a programmable
computer.